First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Steenhuisen benches Phumzile van Damme - supporters are...

South Africa

CHISTKA TIMES

Steenhuisen benches Phumzile van Damme – supporters are outraged

From left, Democratic Alliance MP Phumzile van Damme and party leader John Steenhuisen. (Photos: Gallo Images / Sunday Times / Esa Alexander | Gallo Images / Brenton Geach)

DA leader John Steenhuisen has placed MP Phumzile van Damme on an ‘enforced sabbatical’ – and shuffled her out of his shadow cabinet. DA leadership says it’s all about concern for her health. Van Damme supporters suspect a more personal motive.

“I don’t want to hear his smarmy voice.”

With these eight words, MP Phumzile van Damme may have temporarily torpedoed her career within the DA.

Van Damme’s comment was directed at party leader John Steenhuisen – and was made during a Zoom meeting at the beginning of lockdown, when Van Damme thought her microphone was muted.

The incident was related to Daily Maverick by two senior DA members concerned about what they say has since been a hostile relationship between Steenhuisen and Van Damme.

Now Van Damme has been ordered by the DA leader to take a three-month health sabbatical and has been replaced in her role as shadow communications minister by fellow MP Zak Mbhele.

Van Damme declined to discuss the matter with Daily Maverick, saying that she is reserving comment for her internal legal challenge. On Twitter, however, she expressed outrage about Steenhuisen’s directive to take an unsolicited sabbatical.

“I’ve been open about being sick. I’ve been on sick leave for 3 months, ending 15 Dec. I informed the Chief Whip, I’d still focus on my committee work while on sick leave. I disclosed my illness even though I didn’t need to. So it is being used against me to sideline me,” Van Damme wrote.

She added that even while sick, she still outperformed many of her colleagues.

“I asked for no sabbatical. I determine my health. My doctors determine my health. Not my employer.”

The letter written by Steenhuisen to Van Damme informing her about the sabbatical stated:  

“I remain incredibly concerned about your health situation and the four chronic illnesses that you have been diagnosed with. I understand that these have become incredibly debilitating for you to perform everyday functions, like walking, due to the chronic pain, vertigo and dizziness. I also know that you require significant periods of bed rest.”

Steenhuisen added that the situation would be reassessed on 30 March 2021.

The newly elected DA leader made the decision to place Van Damme on sabbatical on the eve of announcing his new shadow cabinet – the opposition’s term for spokespeople on government departments. Van Damme was announced as being replaced in her role by Mbhele. Steenhuisen has since said that even if she decided not to take the sabbatical, Mbhele would still replace her.

Party insiders allege that it is quite clear that Steenhuisen is opting to remove Van Damme as a result of the animosity between the two – but due to her high-profile status in the party and her high-value contributions as shadow communications minister, Steenhuisen is using Van Damme’s health status for political cover.

Van Damme has won plaudits for her work on Parliament’s communications committee. She played a key role in the downfall of Gupta-employed PR firm Bell Pottinger and more recently has been an important voice in holding Communications Minister Stella Ndabeni-Abrahams to account.

Media lawyer Justine Limpitlaw, a close observer of the SABC saga, said on Twitter that Van Damme is “always the best-prepared MP in the room” when it comes to Parliament’s SABC hearings.

Van Damme is, however, known to be less popular among more conservative DA voters, who see her as needlessly outspoken on social media and were unimpressed by her 2019 public showdown at the V&A Waterfront with a family she accused of racism.

“This is clearly [aimed at] politically ostracising someone who didn’t support John as leader and has had a profoundly fractious relationship with him,” a senior party representative told Daily Maverick.

“The leader could have – as he is entitled to – shifted her without the nonsense of a sabbatical. He didn’t have to evoke a sabbatical to justify firing her. Anyone serves in the shadow cabinet at the behest of the leader.”

The DA’s leadership insists this interpretation is not accurate.

“There is a genuine concern about Phumzile’s health,” party Chief Whip Natasha Mazzone told Daily Maverick. She was the DA representative designated to communicate on the matter.

“Of course, just shuffling the cabinet [to exclude her] would have been easier. But that doesn’t address what we believe to be a serious problem. Part of leadership is knowing if someone is suffering. [Van Damme] has been brave in documenting her illness; she had three months’ sick leave. But we felt that she would benefit from an extended break.”  

Mazzone confirmed that the Zoom incident took place, but denied that it had lingering effects.

“There was a faux pas on Zoom, and it was sorted out. We all laughed about it, and it went down as one of the Zoom laughs of the year,” she told Daily Maverick.

Van Damme has made it clear on social media that she does not intend to leave the DA and will launch a legal challenge against Steenhuisen’s move.

Supporters within the party say she is right to do so, pointing out that the DA has several times challenged presidential appointments and dismissals on the grounds that the decision was irrational. The same principle, they contend, is at stake here. DM

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 15

  • A typical Rebecca Davis article. When people in an organisation are ill they should be treated well and given time off if appropriate. This was what the DA did so what is the problem? Davis stirring anti-DA rubbish because it is what she does best. This should not have been published. Daily Maverick reading in – OK, I know it is a slow news-day but try to be positive about the democratic centre just once now and then and don’t be the reason for democracy to decline in SA.

      • Get real?! If there is no DA who do YOU vote for? The crazy left? The leftish, corrupt ANC? The fascist right EFF? Some minute party, The Purple Party? The Good-ANC Not-So-Lite Party? Or the DA? If there is only one big party (ANC) left that will be the end of democracy. So criticise the DA when it needs criticism but the press in general appear to be anti DA. Have you seen Davis or the DM mention that the DA runs the best city in SA? No. Have you seen her or the DM mention that it runs the best province in SA? No. The DA is at the centre of the political scale and if that goes democracy goes. Do YOU want a healthy democracy or not? YOUR PICK!

  • “we are getting closer to finding out who is/are the individual(s) in DM who can not bring themselves to say a positive thing about the DA.” I believe that it is ALL of them! Do they believe that a democracy is the best thing for South Africa? They seem to be knocking the democratic centre, which is the DA, as hard as they can. THEY are the reason for the decline in the DA in the last general elections, DM and the Press in general. They seem to want an ANC dictatorship. DM Editor reading in – Please give us your take on this and the other comments below. Daily Maverick – The Truth?

  • Although we are in times where opposition parties should be flowering because of the total failure of the ANC to deal with state capture, the DA uses every opportunity to become more irrelevant. Due to the circumstances it should be impossible to reach it, but it seems that they have adopted 15% as its next target… Welcome to the story of glorious self-destruction. Poor South Africa…

  • DM supporters are not outraged by cheap sensational journalism. They are disappointed and will stop subscribing if DM continues to churn out this trash. This is really pathetic.

  • It appears that DA followers/members are as sensitive to justified criticism as those of the ANC. Come on guys, sort your crap out. The opportunity that presents itself at the moment is not going to last forever.

  • I have been concerned about Van Damme ever since that over the top outburst at the Waterfront, and subsequently after reading some rather odd tweets and blogs of hers. I think she needs to relax, and find some balance.

  • Who needs soap operas? We have the EFF, the ANC and the DA. All the while, local service delivery suffers. Stop parachuting in political office bearers! In my town the political commissar overseeing engineering services is a career politician with lawyer training. Pay those salaries to qualified technocrats. Next local elections I am voting local, I have no time for the hysterical dramas or the national policies that are in any event irrelevant because the DA will never govern our country.

      • Paddy : I live in the Western Cape in Drakenstein (Paarl). My parachute comments apply as much to Paarl as it does to the province and Cape Town City. Have a look at the provincial MEC and city mayoral committee members and their departments and CV. It is a joke.

        Why do we have this crazy concept that the winning party drops in their (not directly elected) people (drawn from some favourites list somewhere) to oversee departments they have absolutely and categorically NO COMPETENCE OR EXPERIENCE in? That is basically cadre deployment and we know where that got the ANC.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted