Newsdeck

Trump fires top U.S. election cybersecurity official who defended security of vote

By Reuters 18 November 2020
Caption
WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 26: U.S. President Donald Trump stands next to Butter, the National Thanksgiving Turkey, after giving him a presidential pardon during the traditional event in the Rose Garden of the White House November 26, 2019 in Washington, DC. The turkey pardon was made official in 1989 under former President George H.W. Bush, who was continuing an informal tradition started by President Harry Truman in 1947. Following the presidential pardon, the 47-pound turkey which was raised by farmer Wellie Jackson of Clinton, North Carolina, will reside at his new home, 'Gobbler's Rest,' at Virginia Tech. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

SAN FRANCISCO/WASHINGTON, Nov 17 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump on Tuesday fired top U.S. cybersecurity official Chris Krebs in a tweet, accusing him without evidence of making a "highly inaccurate" statement affirming the Nov. 3 election was secure and rejecting claims of widespread fraud.

By Joseph Menn and Christopher Bing

Trump has made debunked allegations that the election was “rigged” and refused to concede defeat to President-elect Joe Biden. His campaign has filed a flurry of lawsuits in battleground states, although election officials in both parties have said they see no evidence of serious irregularities.

Reuters reported last week that Krebs, who worked on protecting the election from hackers but drew the ire of the Trump White House over efforts to debunk disinformation, had told associates he expected to be fired.

Trump said on Twitter on Tuesday that Krebs had assured people in a “highly inaccurate” statement that the election had been secure when there were “massive improprieties and fraud -including dead people voting, Poll Watchers not allowed into polling locations,” and voting machine errors that flipped votes from Trump to Biden.

Twitter slapped warning labels on Trump’s tweets, noting: “This claim about election fraud is disputed.”

Krebs headed up the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency from its inception two years ago.

He angered the White House over a website run by CISA dubbed “Rumor Control,” which debunks misinformation about the election, according to the three people familiar with the matter.

A CISA spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.

Krebs was not given notice of Trump’s plan to fire him on Tuesday evening, according to a person familiar with the matter, and learned of the decision through Twitter.

The Reuters report last week prompted an outpouring of support from security experts across the country, who praised Krebs for his bipartisan work in the past two years.

The White House’s displeasure with Krebs grew over the past year, according to two former U.S. officials, as Trump criticized the security of mail-in voting and Krebs’ agency countered by saying it represented a secure way to vote. Mail-in balloting reached a record high this year because of voter concerns about the coronavirus pandemic.

 

‘WE DID IT RIGHT’

On his own Twitter account, Krebs did not back down, writing: “Honored to serve. We did it right. Defend Today, Secure Tomorrow.”

White House officials previously complained about CISA content that pushed back against numerous false claims about the election, including that Democrats were behind a mass election fraud scheme. CISA officials declined to delete accurate information.

Among other things, one Krebs associate said the White House was angry about a post rejecting a conspiracy theory that falsely claimed an intelligence agency supercomputer and program, purportedly named Hammer and Scorecard, could have flipped votes nationally. No such system exists, according to Krebs, election security experts and former U.S. officials.

The Biden campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment. But Trump’s move was quickly slammed by security officials and White House critics.

“Krebs was doing important work defending critical infrastructure and fighting disinformation,” said Harri Hursti, a leading critic of voting machine security. “His firing is very disappointing and appears to be an attempt to undermine the great work he and others at DHS/CISA have been doing.”

Democrat Adam Schiff, who heads the House of Representatives Intelligence Committee, said: “Throughout this election, the CISA and Director Krebs have worked diligently to safeguard our elections, provide vital support to state and local election officials, and inform the American people about what was true and what was not.”

Independent Senator Angus King said Trump was “firing Mr. Krebs for simply doing his job.”

“I hope that President-elect Biden will recognize Chris’s contributions, and consult with him as the Biden administration charts the future of this critically important agency,” King said.

Senator Ben Sasse, who has been a Trump critic, was among the first Republicans to push back against the decision. He said in a statement: “Chris Krebs did a really good job — as state election officials all across the nation will tell you — and he obviously should not be fired.”

(Reporting by Joseph Menn and Christopher Bing; Additional reporting by Elizabeth Culliford. Editing by Rosalba O’Brien and Peter Cooney)

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 6

  • Surely Trump’s actions are getting close to treasonous? He’s shooting down in flames the whole democratic system of the USA. Can you imagine the reaction of American people if an African leader had done something similar after being beaten in an election?

  • A few things need to be understood (a) Trump has not yet lost the election, that is simply media reporting – when the margin of victory is around 1% that automatically triggers a recount, which is currently underway in a number of states; (b) Contesting election results are not a new phenomenon – in 2000 the election was finally decided by a court on 12th December after Gore contested a Bush victory – Trump is simply following the formal process and collecting evidence to present to the courts before the deadline in December. Far from shooting down the democratic process, he is following the Constitutional process – so therefore probably reinforcing the democratic process.
    The US Constitution foresaw the likelihood of contested election results – because it has happened many times in the past – and made provision for it. This is fascinating to watch from a distance.

    • I agree with your view that challenging a close result is Trump’s constitutional right. But is he really “collecting evidence to present to the courts”? If so, where is this evidence? Still fiendishly and cleverly hidden out there by the alleged Biden campaign conspiracy? Or is his real motive to undermine the electoral process simply to cast doubt on its legitimacy in the court of public opinion? You decide.

  • In Trump, the US has found its own MBS ! I am sure McConnell and Graham in particular and the Republicans in general, are very proud of this achievement. All I can hope for in his final days in office, is that this deranged individual will order the dismemberment and dissolving in acid of Mc Connell ! After all, it is thanks to him that Trump was not impeached and is still in office. And in his final days is destroying all the things that made America respected in some regards. One can only hope the ‘legislators’ will urgently introduce laws which prevent any future president from becoming a ‘law unto him/herself’ ! One such instance is that of a favourite Republicans claim that all unelected appointees in the administration serve ‘at his pleasure’ – irrespective of how irrational or bizarre the motive is.

  • PRESIDENT VERSUS PUBLIC PROTECTOR

    Ramaphosa’s lawyers on Mkhwebane: ‘Report reveals reckless determination to nail the president’

    By Rebecca Davis