Maverick Citizen


Human rights ‘pushed to the curb’ in the world’s rush to a Covid-19 vaccine

A photo made available by the Russian Direct Investment Fund shows a scientist at Nikolai Gamaleya National Center of Epidemiology and Microbiology working on the production of a two-vector Covid-19 vaccine in Moscow. (Photo: EPA-EFE / RDIF Handout)

The world is hurtling towards a Covid-19 vaccine with much talk about the safeguarding of universal human rights and transparency, but very little tangible progress to show for it, according to detailed research by Human Rights Watch. On Thursday, it released a report on the search for a Covid-19 vaccine. Its solutions include an urgent call for universal support for proposals by South Africa and India to scrap some aspects of international patent laws for Covid-19 vaccines.

It has been repeated since the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic – universal and equitable access to a safe and effective Covid-19 vaccine is the only way to truly overcome the pandemic and return to “normal” life. Yet, the current approach is leading the world far off this path, according to a report released by Human Rights Watch on Thursday 29 October 2020 titled “Whoever Finds the Vaccine Must Share It”: Strengthening Human Rights and Transparency Around Covid-19 Vaccines.

The new report covers the period between 23 April 2020 and 13 October 2020 to provide an up-to-date and extensively researched overview of the world’s disjointed scramble for a Covid-19 vaccine.

The report details how a call for a “people’s vaccine” has remained mere rhetoric as “vaccine nationalism” has instead turned into a very real strategy for many governments. In May 2020, 140 governments and experts signed an open letter agreeing that all Covid-19 medicines – including a vaccine – should be treated as “public goods” and called for a “people’s vaccine”. Six months later, Covid-19 vaccines have been carved up among a handful of rich countries as they spend millions in public money to pre-book numerous potential vaccines. Nevertheless, the report argues it is not too late to change course to one centred on protecting the human rights to life, health and an adequate standard of living.

The world’s path of action is littered with barriers to access which impinge on human rights. One is the use of public money with a “near total lack of transparency”, according to the report. There is little information available on the terms and conditions of this funding, what has been pre-booked for whom, how it will be manufactured, who will receive the vaccine first and when. Already governments had spent $19-billion by mid-September 2020. 

The report details how the world’s most promising Covid-19 vaccines have already been carved up between rich countries many months before they are approved. They have signed deals behind closed doors to reserve doses for their exclusive use. They have done this with several vaccines, resulting in hoarding across the board and leaving very little for the rest of the world “to pick through”, says the report.

The countries that have already spent the most are the US, Germany, the UK, Norway, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, Canada and Spain according to Policy Cures Research. 

A chart showing the countries that have spent the most on Covid-19 vaccine research and development as of 17 September 2020. (Chart: Human Rights Watch)

There were nine vaccine candidates in the final phase of clinical trials by September 2020. Rich countries such as Australia, Hong Kong, Israel, Japan, Switzerland, the UK, the US and the EU have already pre-ordered 51% of five of these potential vaccines. Combined, their populations represent just 13% of the world’s people. 

This leaves 87% of the world’s people out in the cold. Low- and middle-income countries do not have the option to buy into risky advance deals and don’t necessarily have the manufacturing capacity to produce their own doses.

The interactive map, VaxMap, visually represents efforts around the world to develop Covid-19 vaccines. It includes where manufacturing capacity exists and the locations of the companies with vaccine candidates. 

The international web of intellectual property permission laws is another barrier to access. As it stands, the private companies that find a working vaccine will not be able to supply the entire world and might not be willing to share their know-how. This will make it near-impossible for others to manufacture it on a large scale to get the vaccine to all countries quickly and at an affordable price. 

To counter this “vaccine nationalism”, a handful of global cooperation initiatives have been established to either pool money or know-how to speed up the process of rolling out a vaccine and other medical supplies equally and affordably. Nevertheless, they come with their own snags. The Covid-19 Technology Access Pool has been endorsed by only 40 governments. Its COVAX vaccine pillar has been widely endorsed, but because of limited transparency, it is difficult to ascertain how effective it might be.

South Africa is classed as a middle-income country and has opted to enter into COVAX as well as negotiating deals directly with pharmaceutical companies. The number of doses the country gets depends on how much it can pay. And then there is the question of who gets a vaccine, and when.

The global approach will clearly exacerbate the inequalities the pandemic has already deepened, argues Human Rights Watch. Across the globe, there have been massive job losses, disruptions in education, increased domestic violence, reduced access to basic health services and millions more have been pushed into extreme poverty. It has impacted on everyone – yet not everyone will have a fair chance to receive a vaccine and have their human rights protected. 

The approach will result in rich countries getting any vaccine first in limited supply. The roll-out to low- and middle-income countries will be delayed, and, in the meantime, their public health and economies will be damaged further. The Covid-19 virus knows no borders, so if a portion of the world’s population is unprotected, then everyone remains vulnerable to the pandemic’s havoc.

The report argues that governments have an obligation to protect human rights in the search for a Covid-19 vaccine because they are bound by their local laws or international agreements they have signed. 

Most recently, all 196 member states of the World Health Organisation adopted a resolution agreeing to the call for “universal, timely and equitable access to, and fair distribution of, all quality, safe, efficacious and affordable essential health technologies and products, including their components and precursors, that are required in the response to the Covid-19 pandemic as a global priority” – including vaccines. 

It argues that people have the right to know how public money is being spent by their governments. They have the right to benefit from any scientific knowledge generated, whether paid for by their government or not. This must be shared as widely as possible “to prevent the unacceptable prioritisation of profit for some over benefit for all”. 

Only in overcoming divides and vaccine nationalism in a way that respects the human rights of all people in all countries can the world recover from the pandemic once and for all, argues the report. By sharing, the mass roll-out of a vaccine could be cut by years, says the report.

But it’s not over until it’s over. The report urges governments to use their sway to require vaccine developers and manufacturers to share knowledge and technology by joining initiatives such as COVAX. It called for the collective mapping of the world’s capacity to manufacture the vaccines and work together to expand it. In addition, they should not sign deals that undermine equitable global access. There should be laws to cap the prices of the vaccines.

Human Rights Watch supports South Africa’s and India’s calls for parts of international intellectual property law to be waived for Covid-19 vaccines. This will mean the “recipe” for a vaccine is freely available and can be made the world over. In addition, they should compel companies to be transparent about the pricing of vaccines. 

Governments funding research and development should create a public database of all contracts signed and develop a way of constantly consulting civil society about human rights issues. MC/DM


"Information pertaining to Covid-19, vaccines, how to control the spread of the virus and potential treatments is ever-changing. Under the South African Disaster Management Act Regulation 11(5)(c) it is prohibited to publish information through any medium with the intention to deceive people on government measures to address COVID-19. We are therefore disabling the comment section on this article in order to protect both the commenting member and ourselves from potential liability. Should you have additional information that you think we should know, please email [email protected]"

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 1

  • ..a human right to have a vaccine? I would say, stop fighting for your limitations. It’s a human right to refuse a vaccine if you so wish. A mandatory vaccine would be a human rights issue. If anyone thinks a vaccine is some silver bullet that will dissolve this virus, they are naive in my opinion. Many people are under the impression that you can somehow dodge the virus too, via all the current precautions I wont repeat here – also naive. It is a kind of corona-virus, as is the common cold. Viruses mutate usually faster than scientists can come up with the vaccine for that virus (pre-mutation). The flu shot is a prime example – its out of date by the time you get it; its a moving target. What I don’t hear is any real attempt to support humanity to naturally boost their immune systems and to encourage us to improve our health as much as is possible. That would be money far better spent. The pharmaceutical industry must be ecstatic about how much money they’ll be making on this. Globalization is ‘seemingly’ our only hope if we are to ‘progress’. Globalization is actually causing more disparity, so if disparity is what you want to reduce, looking to globalism, global institutions and global mandates, will not assist you. Those in the west who are in the global driving seat, are looking out for their own neck of the woods as you have noted with the vaccine hogging. The reason why globalization thrives (at least up to now) is because there is a developing and third world to exploit. All this talk of fairness and equality is lip service. What would happen if globalization was a ‘fait accompli’ and we were all miraculously equal (..and first world)? No one to manipulate and walk all over anymore…unlikely. It would be check mate. Why keep looking to the west with our begging bowl? Feeling victimized, and calling it out to the wealthy west will not help the non-first world. Lets get healthy, not toxic, by ourselves, without their ‘help’ – our bodies have an incredible ability to heal on their own without interference, and with the correct nutrition. We were not born into this world with a vaccine strapped to us with instructions. Its not the only way.

  • Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted