This is Part Two of Maverick Citizen’s investigation. Read Part One here:
The second Covid-19 Expenditure Disclosure report (April-August 2020), published on 1 October (available here), raises more questions than answers.
On the face of it, the latest report seems to show that since the first report, certain bills have been reallocated from the Gauteng Department of Health (GDoH) to other departments, in particular the Department of Infrastructure Development (DID).
For example, whereas the July report revealed a total expenditure of R1,939,319,260 (R1.939-billion) by the Health Department (then 91% of the total), the latest report reduces that amount to R1,707,762,374 (R1.7-billion) – a drop of more than R200-million even though a further two months of costs have been added.
As a result, health now accounts for “only” 76% of Gauteng’s total Covid-19 bill.
An explanation for this is not provided, except, perhaps since July – in the aftermath of the personal protective equipment (PPE) corruption scandal – all costs are no longer centralised to the GDoH as they had been previously.
Moreover, in the additional two months, total health infrastructure spend has sky-rocketed from R413,481,978 (R413.4-million) to R1,146,736,803 (R1.1-billion).
This includes R365-million spent on the intensive care unit field hospitals.
However, if anything, the Treasury Second Expenditure Disclosure report makes Gauteng’s infrastructure spending even more difficult to decipher.
For example, whereas the first report divided infrastructure spend into two categories (“building upgrade/addition” and “building refurbishment/rehabilitation”), the second report lumps all the costs together.
In addition, many of the infrastructure costs are now listed under – although not necessarily billed to – the DID.
One cost that is attributed to the DID – and which surely must raise some very, very large eyebrows – is an amount of R193,872,750 (R193-million) for “wooden floors at all tents” at Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital paid to Royal Andy Trading Enterprise on 24 July.
According to the report, the “total order amount” for this was meant to be R1,938,727.50 (R1.93-million), making it an overpayment of R191-million. When asked about this by Maverick Citizen, Bongiwe Gambu, spokesperson for the MEC of Infrastructure Development, said that the figure in the report was an error, and that “the actual amount paid was R1,919,098.75 [R1.91-million]”.
“The other amount of R196,191,263 might be for other services provided by Royal Andy, Gauteng health to confirm the amount and services.”
Unfortunately, the GDoH failed to respond to this particular query.
If Gambu is correct and it is an error, then Gauteng Treasury needs to relook at its sums as Royal Andy Trading Enterprise is still recorded in the report as the province’s most expensive supplier.
Our research reveals that Royal Andy Trading Enterprise and Royal Trading Enterprises cc are the same company, yet have been trading with Gauteng Health under both names: the latter is listed as having been paid R11,880,070 in the latest report.
However, even this seems strange because, according to the annexures provided to the report, in July they were paid two amounts of more than R11-million for the supply of disposable masks.
Royal Andy is not a medical supplier and, as with many other companies, is not registered with the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority to supply medical devices. According to their website, they provide a landscaping service, but have also undertaken a number of other recent projects with the Gauteng health department and/or Department of Infrastructure Development. The company has only one director listed by the CIPC.
On Monday 5 October, Maverick Citizen requested Royal Andy to confirm or deny the payments, but no response was received. DM/MC
This is an ongoing investigation. Anyone with information should contact [email protected]
"Information pertaining to Covid-19, vaccines, how to control the spread of the virus and potential treatments is ever-changing. Under the South African Disaster Management Act Regulation 11(5)(c) it is prohibited to publish information through any medium with the intention to deceive people on government measures to address COVID-19. We are therefore disabling the comment section on this article in order to protect both the commenting member and ourselves from potential liability. Should you have additional information that you think we should know, please email [email protected]"
"(O)ur honeymoon will shine our life long: it's beams will only fade over your grave or mine." ~ Charlotte Brontë
Daily Maverick © All rights reserved