SECTION27 and the Equal Education Law Centre (EELC) have approached the court on behalf of a number of learners, parents, teachers and school governing bodies in an attempt to get the government to feed millions of children who have gone hungry since the schools closed during the Covid-19 lockdown.

It was hoped that, once schools started re-opening, the school feeding schemes, which are planned and budgeted for, would resume in full. However, the Minister and the Department of Basic Education have opted, for now, to only feed Grade 7 and 12 children.

SECTION27 and EELC have filed a number of affidavits on behalf of their clients – Equal Education and the School Governing Bodies of two schools.

Maverick Citizen has been given access to affidavits from the SECTION27 and EELC clients and they make for harrowing reading. They tell a story of extreme hunger and poverty, but also of a government that has to be dragged to court to compel them to feed children who desperately need one meal a day, who have no source of food other than the school feeding scheme.

Learners’ affidavits, particularly, make for stomach-churning reading, but it is important to read their stories to try to understand the lived realities of people in small, off-the-map, far-flung villages in South Africa. People, even worse children, going hungry in South Africa is unforgivable. It is also important to pay tribute to the bravery of teachers, parents, school governing bodies and learners who are speaking out despite being fearful of intimidation and losing their jobs.

We publish extracts from 15 affidavits and even though these documents will become public in the courts, SECTION27 and EELC requested that we do not identify their clients by name for fear of intimidation.

Affidavit 8

‘The food I buy lasts for the month in most cases but it has been finishing within three weeks since March this year when schools closed.’

Nono (not real name) lives in the Hlokohloko area, near Jozini in northern KwaZulu-Natal. She lives in a household of 10  people and is the eldest of her siblings and the primary caregiver in the household.

“There are four children in our household who attend school – a girl in grade 9 (aged 14); a boy in grade 9 (aged 17); a boy in grade 8 (aged 14) – all of whom attend a high school and are recipients of the child support grant. A girl is in grade R (aged 5) at the primary school. The youngest girl does not have a birth certificate so she has not been registered to receive the child support grant. Her brother, aged 8 receives a disability grant and attends a crèche.

“There are five adults in the household and we are all unemployed. I go to sell clothes at the social grants paypoint twice a month. We rely on the disability grant and the child support grants. The grants as well as what I earn from selling clothes usually amounts to R2400 per month. I use that money to buy groceries to the value of R1800 for ten of us. I am usually able to make the R1800 stretch for the month. Sometimes, I have to reduce the quantities so that I can afford the groceries. I regularly have to sacrifice toiletries as it becomes too expensive.

“The food I buy lasts for the month in most cases but it has been finishing within three weeks since March this year when schools closed. The children, especially the ones in high school, need to eat regularly. They all receive food at school so having them home means that we eat much more as a family. There have even been times when I have had to borrow money in order to feed the family. We have received some help from neighbours. We had not received the child support grant during May but a social worker was referred to us. She assisted us and we received one food parcel. Fortunately, we have noted the increase in the child support grant in June but we are not sure how secure we are with it after our experience last month. Unfortunately, the increase to the child support grant has not made up for the increase in costs we have experienced. We are now cooking another meal a day for the entire family and this has greatly increased the amount of money we spend on food.

“The four children in school ordinarily receive a meal at school every day through the National School Nutrition Programme. The youngest also receives a meal at his crèche. Not having this meal has made a marked difference. Our food does not last as long and the children seem to be hungry or wanting food much more. The older children have been trying to learn from home but they seem to be struggling. 

“It would be a relief if the National School Nutrition Programme were to resume before the children return to school. Although it is a fair distance to the high school, I think that many children in the community would benefit. This would be even better if there was a nodal point closer to the community.” DM/MC