South Africa


NPA and IPID commit to tackling high-level police corruption

NPA and IPID commit to tackling high-level police corruption
Andrea Johnson says the NPA has enrolled more than 80 cases, with at least 30 high-profile suspects before court. (Archive photo: Ashraf Hendricks)

This comes after two investigators were pulled from the task team.

First published by GroundUp

The National Prosecuting Authority’s (NPA) Investigating Directorate (ID) and the Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID) have issued a joint statement in response to reports that IPID had abruptly pulled two investigators from an ID task team probing corruption allegations against former and current top police officials.

In 2019, IPID seconded six investigators to the ID to assist with “serious, high profile or complex” corruption cases. On Thursday, Viewfinder reported that IPID had recalled two of the investigators who worked on, among other cases, corruption allegations against former police commissioner Kgomotso Phahlane. They were also told to hand over their dockets to head office.

In response to queries, IPID did not deny that the investigators had been recalled.

Viewfinder also reported warnings from former IPID officials that the recalls may have been aimed to protect corruption accused cops from prosecution.

In response to this news report, the ID and IPID have committed to “strengthen” their collaboration. The statement was however vague on exactly what this strengthened collaboration would look like.

The statement follows a meeting between IPID and the ID. The meeting addressed IPID’s constrained capacity, which is exacerbated by an increased number of cases against police officers emanating from Covid-19 lockdown enforcement, and the ID’s need to maintain “a skilled and stable team” on its corruption cases emanating from the state security sector.

The two management teams committed to finding mutual solutions to these challenges and to identify and prioritise the “most pressing” cases to “root out corruption at the highest levels in the police”.

Viewfinder put queries to both IPID and the ID to find out what these ongoing deliberations meant for the two investigators recalled by IPID last week. In particular, were they to be provisionally retained within the ID or provisionally recalled, while these deliberations were ongoing?

Neither IPID nor the ID responded to this question at time of publication. DM

This article forms part of an ongoing Viewfinder series on alleged police criminality and police oversight in South Africa. It was made possible, in part, by a grant from the Henry Nxumalo Fund for Investigative Reporting.


Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

A South African Hero: You

There’s a 99.8% chance that this isn’t for you. Only 0.2% of our readers have responded to this call for action.

Those 0.2% of our readers are our hidden heroes, who are fuelling our work and impacting the lives of every South African in doing so. They’re the people who contribute to keep Daily Maverick free for all, including you.

The equation is quite simple: the more members we have, the more reporting and investigations we can do, and the greater the impact on the country.

Be part of that 0.2%. Be a Maverick. Be a Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options