Newsdeck

COVID-19

Tobacco sale U-turn was collective decision – Ramaphosa defends Dlamini Zuma

Tobacco sale U-turn was collective decision – Ramaphosa defends Dlamini Zuma
The National Command Council, led by Minister of COGTA Dr Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma briefing on regulations relating to the COVID-19 Level 4 Restrictions, 29 April 2020. (Photo: Jairus Mmutle/GCIS)

The office of President Cyril Ramaphosa has come out in defence of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs Minister Dr Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma following days of attacks levelled against her over a U-turn on the ban on cigarettes sales.

Dlamini-Zuma has faced widespread criticism from citizens, politicians and interest groups after she announced that cigarettes and tobacco products would not be sold from 1 May, when the country moved to Level 4 on the Covid-19 lockdown risk scale.

The country has been under lockdown since 26 March in a bid to stop the spread of the deadly novel coronavirus.

As of Sunday, 131 South Africans have died from the Covid-19 disease, while 6 783 positive cases have been recorded.

On 23 April, in announcing the downgrading of the lockdown from Level 5, Ramaphosa said the sale of cigarettes would be allowed under Level 4.

British American Tobacco and the Fair Trade Independent Tobacco Association had both been lobbying government to unban the sale of cigarettes and associated products before Ramaphosa’s announcement.

Both organisations have since threatened government with legal action.

But less than a week later, Dlamini-Zuma announced government’s U-turn on the matter, sparking criticism and questioning of the National Coronavirus Command Council’s decision-making and actions.

Dlamini-Zuma has largely borne the brunt of the criticism for this decision, with some accusing her of undermining the president and acting on her own against the tobacco industry.

But Ramaphosa has come out in defence of his minister, writing in his weekly newsletter  that the council took a “collective decision” on the matter.

“After careful consideration and discussion, the NCCC reconsidered its position on tobacco. As a result, the regulations ratified by Cabinet and announced by Minister Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma on 29 April extended the prohibition,” wrote the president.”This was a collective decision and the public statements by both myself and the minister were done on behalf of, and mandated by, the collective I lead.”

Speaking to News24, Ramaphosa’s spokesperson, Khusela Diko, said he considers “the attacks on Minister Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma as baseless, unfounded and frankly very malicious”.

“When the president announced that the ban on the sale of tobacco would be lifted it was a view of the National Command Council at that point in time based on information that they had,” said Diko.

She added the president also announced there would be public consultations ahead of the regulations being adopted and gazetted.

Diko said the council changed its stance after public consultation and engaging with numerous stakeholders.

While the president’s spokesperson did not indicate whether the decision to continue with the ban on cigarettes would be changed, she said government was facing numerous threats of litigation.

Last week, News24 reported that two high-profile advocates had written a letter to the president regarding the decision.

Ramaphosa is set to give clarity over the role of the command council on Monday. This will include an explanation of some of the decisions it has taken, including the continued ban on the sale of cigarettes.

News24

DM

Gallery

"Information pertaining to Covid-19, vaccines, how to control the spread of the virus and potential treatments is ever-changing. Under the South African Disaster Management Act Regulation 11(5)(c) it is prohibited to publish information through any medium with the intention to deceive people on government measures to address COVID-19. We are therefore disabling the comment section on this article in order to protect both the commenting member and ourselves from potential liability. Should you have additional information that you think we should know, please email [email protected]"

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

X

This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.


Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Feeling powerless in politics?

Equip yourself with the tools you need for an informed decision this election. Get the Elections Toolbox with shareable party manifesto guide.