The South African general public might be justifiably confused about the details, timing, outcomes and implications of three court actions by Eskom challenging a number of previous determinations by energy regulator Nersa.
Customers might also not understand the implications of the latest regulatory clearing account (RCA) application by Eskom for its 2018/19 financial year, which is not yet the subject of any legal challenge.
Eskom insists its electricity prices are far from cost reflective and they need to rise by 30% in order to become so. Thereafter, Eskom says electricity prices would stabilise, with only inflationary increases in subsequent years.
Eskom’s court actions
Nersa’s fourth multi-year price determination for the 2019/20, 2020/21 and 2021/22 financial years
In late 2019, Eskom applied for urgent interim relief pending a full judicial review of Nersa’s fourth multi-year price determination (MYPD 4) for the 2019/20, 2020/21 and 2021/22 financial years.
Eskom wanted revenue of R219-billion, R252-billion and R291-billion respectively for each year (i.e. a 16% increase for each year), but was only allowed R206.4-billion, R221.8-billion and R233.1-billion (i.e. increases of 9.41%, 8.10% and 5.22%). This resulted in a R102-billion shortfall for Eskom.
The significant portion of this shortfall (R69-billion) was caused by Nersa effectively considering a government bailout of 3 x R23-billion, or R69-billion, in this period as revenue. Therefore Nersa effectively reduced Eskom’s allowed revenue by this amount. Eskom is now seeking to recover the R69-billion through a review of Nersa’s MYPD 4 determination. It is not clear how Eskom is seeking to meet the remaining shortfall of R33-billion (R102-billion minus R69-billion).
Eskom’s urgent interim application to recover R58.5-billion of the R69-billion shortfall through a 16.6% and 16.7% price increase for 2020/21 and 2021/22 respectively, instead of the 9.41% and 8.10% increase granted by Nersa for these years, was rejected by the court on the basis that the matter was not urgent and should be heard following the normal court review process.
The full judicial review of MYPD 4 is now expected to be heard in court some time in 2020. In its papers, Eskom argues that Nersa’s MYPD 4 determination was irrational and made in bad faith and asks the court to order the determination be sent back to Nersa for rework and adjustment.
Nersa’s RCA determination for the 2014/15, 2015/16 and 2016/17 financial years
In addition, Eskom is seeking a full judicial review of Nersa’s RCA determination for the 2014/15, 2015/16 and 2016/17 financial years.
For this period, Eskom applied to claw back R67-billion from electricity customers via the tariffs. However, only R32-billion was permitted by Nersa, which the regulator allowed Eskom to recover via a once-off 4.4% increase in the Eskom tariff applied over four years (2019/20, 2020/21, 2021/22 and 2022/23).
This results in a shortfall of R35-billion for Eskom and the utility is seeking a court order instructing Nersa to rework and adjust its RCA determination for the 2014/15, 2015/16 and 2016/17 financial years to address alleged shortcomings of the determination.
This review application by Eskom has not yet been heard in court and is being opposed by Nersa. It is not clear exactly how much of the R35-billion shortfall Eskom expects to recover through this review.
Nersa’s single-year revenue and price determination for the 2018/19 financial year
Finally, Eskom has sought a review of Nersa’s revenue and price determination for the 2018/19 financial year.
For this period, Eskom wanted revenue of R219.5-billion (a 19.9% increase) but was only allowed R190.3-billion (a 5.23% increase). This resulted in a shortfall of R29.2-billion for Eskom and the utility is seeking a court order instructing Nersa to rework and adjust its revenue and price determination for the 2018/19 financial year to address alleged shortcomings of the determination.
This application by Eskom was heard in court and in March 2020 the judge ruled in favour of Eskom. The judgment declared Nersa’s revenue and price determination for the 2018/19 financial year irrational and unprocedural, sent the determination back to Nersa for rework and ordered Nersa to bear the costs of Eskom’s application.
It is not clear yet whether Nersa intends to appeal this judgment, nor exactly how much of this R29.2-billion shortfall Eskom expects to recover as a result of the judgment.
Eskom’s RCA application to Nersa for the 2018/19 financial year
In August 2019, Eskom applied for an RCA determination by Nersa for its 2018/19 financial year to claw back an amount of R27.3-billion from electricity customers via the tariffs.
Public hearings were held throughout South Africa by Nersa in February and March 2020 in respect of this application and Eskom, and the country, await an outcome in order to understand its impact on electricity pricing in the future.
Through three court actions, Eskom is challenging Nersa determinations dating as far back as 2014 that resulted in revenue shortfalls totalling R102-billion, R35-billion and R29-billion (a total of R166-billion) and the associated electricity price increases that were well below what Eskom wanted.
In addition, in an RCA application to Nersa for the 2018/19 financial year, Eskom is currently seeking to claw back an additional R27.3-billion from electricity customers though electricity price increases over and above Eskom’s normal annual price increases.
With Eskom’s electricity sales revenue for the 2018/19 financial year at R180-billion, it is clear the revenue shortfalls of R166-billion challenged in court actions by Eskom, plus the current RCA application to claw back R27.3-billion from electricity customers via the tariffs, could result in additional price increases very significantly higher than those currently awarded by Nersa for the next few years.
While Eskom is unlikely to be able to recover the full alleged revenue shortfalls in its applications, nor will it be allowed to recover these in a single year, the above figures do indicate the scale of what Eskom is trying to achieve through its various court actions and its RCA application. DM
Chris Yelland is MD of EE Business Intelligence.
The filming of The Beach permanently damaged the ecosystem on the Thai island it was located on.