GroundUp: Parliamentarian tries to curb abortion
- South Africa
- 01 Aug 2017 11:22 (South Africa)
Terminating a pregnancy after 12 weeks will be much harder if a private member's bill passes. By Safura Abdool Karim for GROUNDUP.
First published by GroundUp
A Member of Parliament is trying to limit the right to abortion. Cheryllyn Dudley (ACDP) introduced a private member’s bill that proposes a severe departure from existing law.
Under current legislation, any woman may have an abortion up to 12 weeks into the pregnancy. From week 13 to 20, a woman may have an abortion if the pregnancy poses a risk to her or it would “significantly affect” her “social or economic circumstances”. This last reason makes South African abortion law different to many other countries. It makes abortions accessible to almost all women up to their 20th week.
If passed, Dudley’s bill would remove this option for women, making it more difficult to have an abortion after 12 weeks. Most women only discover their unplanned pregnancy between their 8th and 10th week, so this would be especially difficult for them.
In essence, it would be illegal for women to get an abortion from week 13 unless the pregnancy endangers the woman’s life or the foetus is severely malformed. The bill would also make it illegal for doctors to perform abortions from week 13 where the pregnancy poses a risk of injury to the foetus, something currently allowed.
The bill also tries to dissuade women from having abortions. Currently, if you wish to have an abortion you do not have to undergo any counselling, but the bill makes counselling mandatory. Also, this counselling requires doctors to show women photographs and pictures of developing foetuses as well as information about available alternatives like adoption.
Similar laws have been introduced in the United States to discourage women from exercising their reproductive rights. While the bill claims to do this so that women are informed, in practice it will hinder a woman’s freedom and right to bodily autonomy.
The bill also requires that an ultrasound be done to estimate how long a woman seeking an abortion has been pregnant. While at first glance, this appears to be a harmless amendment, it would make abortions less accessible if the clinic does not have enough ultrasound machines or staff to perform them. Current medical practice does not use ultrasounds to determine the length of the pregnancy, irrespective of whether an abortion is being sought.
Dudley consulted only Doctors for Life, an anti-abortion organisation, and two people from New Zealand (a country with very restrictive abortion laws) when drafting the bill.
The bill has not yet been tabled in Parliament. Comments may be emailed to the Speaker of the National Assembly at email@example.com and to firstname.lastname@example.org until Wednesday, 9 August 2017. DM
Photo: The Marie Stopes clinics provide many reproductive health services, including abortion. Photo: Ashraf Hendricks
Reader notice: Our comments service provider, Civil Comments, has stopped operating and will terminate services on 20th Dec 2017. As a result, we will be searching for another platform for our readers. We aim to have this done with the launch of our new site in early 2018 and apologise for the inconvenience.