The more I read the Complete Works of Lao Tzu and embrace his teachings, the more the scattered parts of my political thought fall into place and become a seamless whole. Analysis of the situation at hand seems effortless as my heart opens up to the views of all the people in my life. I have time for everything worthwhile, even to think before I act or speak. My mind becomes empty of preconceptions as it becomes transparent and serene. I embrace sorrow as much as joy and failure as much as success. I can easily act with integrity and compassion; and as a result I have come to trust life completely.
What is happening in this country, in historical terms, is that, to use W. B. Yeats’ words in The Second Coming: we are:
“Turning and turning in the widening gyre; The falcon cannot hear the falconer; Things Fall Apart; the centre cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world”.
It seems that the theory of vulgar individualism and fetish corruption has triumphed over the political firmness and sharpness of the leadership of the African National Congress in defending its political line and organisational discipline, and, thus, of the entire society. This does not, however, establish catastrophism as some sort of messianic truth. As we know, equilibrium by its very nature is unstable. Unthinkable events and countervailing tendencies, which among other things create social stress and sombre mood in terms of political timing, are part of the dynamism of the reality of our life.
It is at times such as these – of political, social and economic uncertainties – that a servant leadership must rise to the occasion. Of servant leadership, Lao Tzu says:
Do not look only at yourself, and you will see much.
Do not justify yourself, and you will be distinguished.
Do not brag, and you will have merit.
Do not be prideful, and your work will endure.
And in another text of his colossal works, Lao Tzu educates us thus:
The wicked leader is he who the people despise.
The good leader is he who the people revere.
The great leader is he who the people say, “We did it ourselves”.
I agree with Antonio Gramsci that “the entire science and art of politics are based on the primordial fact, in that there really do exist rulers and ruled, leaders and led”. Sustaining his thought, it will have to be considered how one can lead most effectively; how leaders may best be prepared to be leaders, and how they can tell the lines of least resistance from the rational lines along which they should proceed to secure the consent and admiration of the led or ruled.
Respect and obedience must be earned and solicited. Understanding of this principle and its strict observation by those who are charged with leading is necessary. This distinguishes a true leader from those who think that they are bigger than the organisations that made them, and whose weaknesses are the hardest to correct.
In honour of the history of our liberation struggle and the future of the country, we need servant leadership. Leaders cannot expect that respect and obedience must be automatic and that their decisions and actions must be followed without question. Servant leaders must be accountable to the people they lead, and by so doing, accept public scrutiny but not personalised insults and be prepared to explain their political actions and inactions at all times instead of hiding behind conspiracy theories.
Common sense dictates that the majority of “collective (political) disasters” occur because no attempt is being made to avoid repeated political mistakes, or that there’s no consequent account for costly transgressions.
As an MK soldier, my comrades and I were prepared for and capable of going for days without food because our leadership made an effort to explain the situation to us, and in some instances it was obvious that it was physically impossible for supplies to reach us.
The political and organisational discipline was derived precisely from this necessity of explaining organisational action or inaction. In that way, staunch political training was made of a contingent of young leaders who refused to be run over by personal ambitions or dictatorial habits of people who did not have the interests of the struggling mass at heart.
Although it seems that “Things Fall Apart” and that “the centre cannot hold”, as a cadre of the ANC, I still hold the strong conviction that there is a core of leaders within the ANC who are determined to bring back the soul of the organisation within the prescripts of our political principles that the ANC and MK were founded on.
Put differently, the ANC worked hard for the democracy we enjoy today. By so saying, I implore our leaders not to allow our hard-earned gains to die because of brutish individualism. They need to examine scrupulously all political ideas and actions in the light of the needs of the country, ruthlessly fight against all tendencies which divert from consulting widely, and work tirelessly to unite us for the common good.
I do not want to praise the dead in order to vilify the living, but Oliver Tambo’s hard work for organisational unity, even to the detriment of his health, must not be in vain. It was not for nothing that Nelson Mandela put the interests of the country and collective leadership of the ANC before his personal interest or position.
It is in this very important sense that the lessons of the Rivonia Trialists and of the exiled leadership of Tambo in building an organisation that was destined to be the ruling party must be adopted and practised by all those who are prepared to lead. Political and organisational culture therefore cannot be abandoned for the convenience of individual interest.
In an epoch where “politics of the stomach” is tempting, it is exactly on the questions of servant leadership and discipline for organisational work that political differences become explicit. Some people seem to regard the ANC as simply a contractual discipline to stop individuals from going off the rails as they react to class pressure. But it is more than that: leaders must become the servants of the people in word and deed – a true representative of the general interest of the country and shining example of paying allegiance to the country’s Constitution.
In the current situation, differences of opinion can be allowed within the leading collective provided such differences do not set out to undermine the programme and policy of the ruling party and the Constitution of the country.
In seeking to unite the membership and the country, the ANC needs to address the pressing issue of ethnicity in line with the founding creed of the ANC in 1912. To be seen to be selecting ministers and leaders of State entities from one ethical group is unfavourable to the historical objective of the ANC. We need to see to it that the experiences of the elders in the Struggle are utilised to educate a membership and citizens in the superiority of the servant leadership method; which is, essentially, the superiority of a democratic collective leadership.
Any attempt to resolve our differences, based on mistrust and factionalism, will have serious consequences for the future of our organisation and the country. That is why a servant leadership must be the most vigilant custodian of democracy and the firmest defender of the discipline and rights of the membership as a whole. It is the inter-relationship between democracy and the servant leadership method that causes so much yearning for the leadership of Tambo and Mandela. The leadership collective that the two represented kept the unity of the organisation under difficult conditions as their priority and a necessary condition for victory. They left a legacy that any honest leader who has the interest of his or her people at heart will want to emulate. The question is: What legacy does the leadership that followed Tambo and Mandela would want to leave for future generations? DM
Popo Maja is a former MK soldier and Robben Islander. He is writing in his personal capacity.
Photo: Sacked former Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan (C) flanked by former cabinet minister, Derek Hanekom (L) and Graca Machel (R), the wife of the late former South African President, Nelson Mandela join supporters of late anti-apartheid activist Ahmed Kathrada at his public memorial service in Johannesburg, South Africa, 01 April 2017. EPA/CORNELL TUKIRI
Watch Pauli van Wyk’s Cat Play The Piano Here!
No, not really. But now that we have your attention, we wanted to tell you a little bit about what happened at SARS.
Tom Moyane and his cronies bequeathed South Africa with a R48-billion tax shortfall, as of February 2018. It's the only thing that grew under Moyane's tenure... the year before, the hole had been R30.7-billion. And to fund those shortfalls, you know who has to cough up? You - the South African taxpayer.
It was the sterling work of a team of investigative journalists, Scorpio’s Pauli van Wyk and Marianne Thamm along with our great friends at amaBhungane, that caused the SARS capturers to be finally flushed out of the system. Moyane, Makwakwa… the lot of them... gone.
But our job is not yet done. We need more readers to become Maverick Insiders, the friends who will help ensure that many more investigations will come. Contributions go directly towards growing our editorial team and ensuring that Daily Maverick and Scorpio have a sustainable future. We can’t rely on advertising and don't want to restrict access to only those who can afford a paywall subscription. Membership is about more than just contributing financially – it is about how we Defend Truth, together.
So, if you feel so inclined, and would like a way to support the cause, please join our community of Maverick Insiders.... you could view it as the opposite of a sin tax. And if you are already Maverick Insider, tell your mother, call a friend, whisper to your loved one, shout at your boss, write to a stranger, announce it on your social network. The battle for the future of South Africa is on, and you can be part of it.
Billionaire oil tycoon J Paul Getty had a pay phone in his home so he wouldn't have to pay for guests' calls.