First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Letter to the Editor: Inability to see the wood from th...

South Africa

South Africa

Letter to the Editor: Inability to see the wood from the trees in the Sassa matter is perplexing

The administration of payment of social grants by CPS via the unlawful Sassa tender award refers. If the finding that CPS has no right to benefit has any teeth, it means that CPS must disgorge all profits it has made so far. By PAUL HOFFMAN.

It seems clear from the explanations, such as they were, given by the Minister of Social Development Bathabile Dlamini to Scopa yesterday, and from what has fallen, on oath, from the lips of Serge Belamant of CPS regarding the payment of social grants after the end of this month, that there is no agreement between Sassa and CPS in relation to the amount to be paid for CPS continuing this service for another period beyond the expiry of the existing invalid contract to do so. The invalidity of the contract is currently suspended by an Order of Court until the end of this month.

This inability to see the wood for the trees is perplexing.

The highly contested contract currently in place is under the supervision of the Constitutional Court. That court has ruled that CPS has no right to benefit from the unlawful tender award to it by Sassa. The court has ordered that if Sassa does not award a new contract (which is clearly currently the position) then:

(I) CPS must file with the court an audited statement of the expenses incurred, the income received, and the net profit earned under the completed contract;

(ii) Sassa must obtain and file with the court an independently audited verification of the audited statement provided by CPS.

If the finding that CPS has no right to benefit has any teeth, it means that CPS must disgorge all profits it has made so far. Any possible extension or “new deal” should be completed at cost and not for profit. This is what “no benefit” means.

In these circumstances it ought to be a simple matter for Sassa and CPS to agree that for the next little while (they are talking two years) CPS will continue to administer payment of grants at cost. Anything more would put Sassa and CPS in breach of the finding that the latter has no right to benefit from the unlawful tender. It is plainly due to the existence of the unlawful award of the tender that CPS is now apparently the only entity on earth that is able to continue to do the work needed to ensure that grant beneficiaries are timeously in receipt of their grants.

What goes around, comes around. DM

Paul Hoffman SC is Director of the Institute for Accountability in Southern Africa, campaigning as Accountability Now

Photo: Minister of Social Development Bathabile Dlamini, by GCIS

Gallery

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted