S.African opposition in court to block ICC exit

By AFP 5 December 2016

South Africa's main opposition party, the Democratic Alliance, launched a legal bid on Monday to block government plans to withdraw from the International Criminal Court, saying the move was unconstitutional.

In October the government notified the United Nations that it would leave the ICC, dealing a major blow to the troubled institution that was set up to try the world’s worst crimes.

The DA lobbied for the High Court in Pretoria to nullify the decision, saying that the government had bypassed and “undermined” parliament, which had ratified South Africa joining the court in 1998.

Only parliament can decide to remove South Africa from the treaty,” DA lawyer Steven Budlender said.

“What’s going on here is really the usurpation of parliament’s legislative powers.”

The withdrawal is set to take effect next October, one year after the government notified the UN, making South Africa the first country to pull out from the court.

Within weeks of South Africa announcing its withdrawal, Burundi and The Gambia formally submitted their notifications to quit the court.

Kenya and Namibia have also suggested they could leave the court, which several African countries have accused of having a bias against the continent.

South Africa’s decision followed a dispute last year when Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir visited for an African Union summit despite facing an ICC arrest warrant over alleged war crimes.

South Africa refused to arrest him, saying he enjoyed immunity as a head of state.

Bashir has evaded arrest since his ICC indictment in 2009 for alleged war crimes in Sudan’s Darfur conflict in which 300,000 people were killed and two million forced to flee their homes.

In March, South Africa’s Supreme Court of Appeal accused President Jacob Zuma’s government of “disgraceful conduct” over Bashir’s visit and ruled that the failure to arrest the Sudanese leader was unlawful.


© 1994-2016 Agence France-Presse


In other news...

South Africa is in a very real battle. A political fight where terms such as truth and democracy can seem more of a suggestion as opposed to a necessity.

On one side of the battle are those openly willing to undermine the sovereignty of a democratic society, completely disregarding the weight and power of the oaths declared when they took office. If their mission was to decrease society’s trust in government - mission accomplished.

And on the other side are those who believe in the ethos of a country whose constitution was once declared the most progressive in the world. The hope that truth, justice and accountability in politics, business and society is not simply fairy tale dust sprinkled in great electoral speeches; but rather a cause that needs to be intentionally acted upon every day.

However, it would be an offensive oversight not to acknowledge that right there on the front lines, alongside whistleblowers and civil society, stand the journalists. Armed with only their determination to inform society and defend the truth, caught in the crossfire of shots fired from both sides.

If you believe in supporting the cause and the work of Daily Maverick then take your position on the battleground and sign up to Maverick Insider today.

For whatever amount you choose, you can support Daily Maverick and it only takes a minute.

Support Daily MaverickPayment options

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or if you are already an Insider.


Gravy Trains, always on time: Cash from Prasa’s R3.5bn locomotives deal also flowed to Jacob Zuma Foundation

By Pieter-Louis Myburgh and Sikonathi Mantshantsha


Zuma told me Ngcuka ‘hated’ him, claims Nxasana

Erin Bates 4 hours ago

"It's the friends you can call up at 4am that matter." ~ Marlene Dietrich