The soul of wit
15 December 2017 20:11 (South Africa)
South Africa

GroundUp: Protesting UCT students reject Nzimande’s fees plan

  • GroundUp
    GroundUp
  • South Africa
Student leaders addressed protesting students on UCT campus today. Photo: Ashleigh Furlong

The UCT campus was closed for a second day in a row as students protested against education minister Blade Nzimande’s plan for free varsity education for the poor but not the well-off. By Ashleigh Furlong for GROUNDUP.

First published by GroundUp

Several hundred protesting University of Cape Town (UCT) students shut down its campus on Tuesday, calling for their demands to be met.

These demands include the implementation of a “free quality and decolonial” education, the ending of interdicts and expulsions of students who were involved in protests earlier this year, and a minimum wage of R12,500 a month for all workers.

The students began the day by blocking the entrances to the campus, with groups of protesters entering lectures and halting them.

By midday, management announced that the university would remain closed on Tuesday and Wednesday. At the same time a large group of protesting students gathered on the upper campus where they were addressed by student leaders.

Athabile Nonxuba, an SRC candidate in the upcoming elections at the university, told the students that they were “on the right side of history”.

He questioned why some students were not participating in the protest since they were affected by yesterday’s announcement about the fee increase for 2017. In the announcement, Minister of Higher Education and Training Blade Nzimande said universities could increase fees by up to 8% and that families with household incomes of less than R600,000 could apply to have the increase subsidised.

However, the protesters’ position appears to be contradicted by the UCT Student Representative Council which yesterday described Nzimande’s statement as a “positive step”, although it criticised  the minister’s “lack of attention to the resounding call for free education in our lifetime”.

UCT Professor of Microbiology, Edward  Rybicki, wrote an open letter  to vice-chancellor Max Price in which he stated: 

“It is completely unfair to expect staff to come to work when everything to do with [undergraduate] teaching has been cancelled, and not only not facilitate them being able to get to work, but also fail signally to protect them when they are there. I appreciate that some folk may feel that “militarisation” of our campus is offensive and upsetting; I submit that the abject failure to be seen to protect the people that are the core of the teaching and research endeavours is more offensive, and more upsetting.

“I also note that, close to a year after I asked the question in Senate, there has still been no overt effort to find out just what level of support the various amorphous tendencies and groupings that are disrupting our university, actually have. I am glad that – finally! – the SRC is no longer being effectively sidelined.”

Suellen Shay, a dean and associate professor at UCT’s Centre for Higher Education Development, wrote that Nzimande had put forward a pro-poor policy. She wrote:

“The minister confirmed that students who benefit from the National Student Aid Financial Scheme (NSFAS) will not pay increased fees in 2017. The good news is that he added a second category of students who will not be required to pay increased fees next year: the missing middle. These are students whose parents earn too much money to qualify for loans from NSFAS but too little to actually afford university fees. Money will now be found to ensure that this group doesn’t pay increased fees in 2017.”

She further wrote:

“The focus in the next few days will be less on making fee-related decisions or discussing the minister’s announcement. Universities will be focusing on security, on keeping campuses open or shutting them down amid safety concerns. There’s no head space to tackle students’ underlying deep-seated anger and frustration. We’ll be trying to figure out the cost of security per day instead of having bigger discussions.”

Meanwhile, student leader and postgraduate student Lindiwe Dlamini told the crowd on campus that she owed the university R48,000 but her family could not afford to pay.

She said students were tired of protesting continuously.

“This has to be the last year that we protest about fees,” she said.

Dlamini said university management was playing a “Mickey  Mouse divide and conquer game” in which it had succeeded, since some students had created a petition online demanding that the university take action against the protesters.

The protesters are also calling for a “Shackville TRC”. This follows the action taken by the university management after students erected a shack on the campus in protest against the university’s residence policy.

Included in demands from workers are for disciplinary action not to be taken against workers for taking part in protest action and for “insourcing across the board”. Most workers have already been insourced.

Protester Sinawo Thambo told GroundUp that Nzimande’s announcement yesterday that households earning less than R600,000 would be able to apply for a subsidy to cover the fee increase was a “dividing tactic”. He called for “free decolonial education for all”.

While protests accelerated at the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) on Tuesday, the University of the Western Cape (UWC) and Cape Peninsula University of Technology (CPUT) were  quiet. A UWC student who was expelled during protests,  Songezo  Mazizi, said members of the FeesMustFall movement had met the rector yesterday to engage with him about their demands. 

Mazizi said the FeesMustFall movement rejected Nzimande’s plan. DM

Photo: Student leaders addressed protesting students on the UCT campus on Tuesday. Photo: Ashleigh Furlong

  • GroundUp
    GroundUp
  • South Africa

Get overnight news and latest Daily Maverick articles






Reader notice: Our comments service provider, Civil Comments, has stopped operating and will terminate services on 20th Dec 2017. As a result, we will be searching for another platform for our readers. We aim to have this done with the launch of our new site in early 2018 and apologise for the inconvenience.