World

Analysis: Is China really the bad guy in Africa?

By Simon Allison 13 January 2015

According to foreign minister Wang Yi, when it comes to Africa, China’s intentions are entirely benevolent. It cares about Africa’s environment, it cares about Africa’s long term interests and it certainly doesn’t harbour any nasty neo-colonial intentions. He would say that, of course. But how wrong is he really? By SIMON ALLISON.

Welcome to Africa, foreign minister Wang Yi. The Chinese envoy is in the middle of a whirlwind five-nation tour of the continent, on an itinerary that includes Cameroon, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Kenya and Sudan.

He’s here to deliver a reassuring message: that China is not the bad guy we all think it is.

“Politically, we always speak up for African countries and uphold justice. Economically, we help African countries to enhance development to achieve prosperity,” he said, speaking to Chinese Central Television from Kenya.

“In China’s exchanges and cooperation with Africa, we want to see mutual benefit and win-win results. I want to make clear one point, that is, China will never follow the track of western colonists and all cooperation with Africa will never come at the expense of the ecology, environment or long-term interests of Africa.”

But just how reassured should we be? Forgive us for being sceptical, Mr Minister, but China’s record so far doesn’t exactly match those lofty standards (especially on the environmental issue, where China’s record of remarkable industrialisation at home has been accompanied by widespread environmental devastation).

A little context to these remarks comes from Ross Anthony, interim director of Stellenbosch University’s Centre for Chinese Studies, who told the Daily Maverick that the lofty language doesn’t necessarily match China’s hard-nosed business approach.

“Chinese defence against ‘neo-colonialism’ is nothing new; several Chinese presidents, ministers and ambassadors have been refuting this claim as long as (particularly) western critics have been making it,” said Anthony. “The part on ecological environmental protection is something which is becoming more prominent in Chinese high-level official responses to their presence in Africa. For instance, earlier this year, Chinese premier Li Keqiang’s visit to Africa was accompanied by a 10 million dollar anti-ivory initiative – something not done before. This is probably part of China’s growing green awareness within its own country but is also reflective of the growing environmental strain which Chinese investments (as is the case for other large international investors) are having within Africa (i.e. in mining, forestry, illegal wildlife products).”

Richard Poplak, Daily Maverick correspondent and co-author of a forthcoming book examining China’s relationship with the continent, concurs.

“Those are wonderful sentiments, but they don’t really stand up to scrutiny. On the many projects I’ve visited on the continent being built by Chinese state-owned enterprises – which is to say companies executing Chinese foreign policy whims – the environmental assessments have been poor or non-existent. For the foreign ministry’s statements to have any resonance, Chinese state-owned enterprises need to transparently adhere to global best practices, or spare us the rhetoric. I’m not saying the Chinese are ‘worse’ than those from whom the foreign minister is distancing his country. I’m saying they’re no better, until they prove otherwise.”

On the political front, there’s an element of truth to the rote denials of China’s colonial intentions: China’s entry into Africa in recent years has been facilitated by its oft-stated policy of non-interference in the internal affairs of African countries, and publicly this has generally been implemented. One exception is the recent deployment of 700 Chinese soldiers to act as peacekeepers in South Sudan – an entirely altruistic act, apparently, despite the large Chinese investment in that country. “China’s mediation of South Sudan issues is completely the responsibility and duty of a responsible power, and not because of China’s own interests,” said minister Wang, at a separate news conference in Sudan.

But even if we assume that there is no hint of neo-colonialism in China’s involvement in Africa, it does not necessarily follow that China’s motives are pure, nor that Africa will benefit from its presence here.

“What I have witnessed, from talks with academics and business people, is that the relation seems to be placed on a more equal level, on the basis of mutual interest,” commented Gaia Manco, a freelance journalist who splits her time between Johannesburg and Beijing, and who is a specialist on the China-Africa relationship. “The key interest is making business, and more precisely trade. So China might not be here to exploit [just] African resources, but they are certainly here to sell Chinese products and technology, and I will not expect Chinese business to care about any African long-term interest, such as the establishment of African factories and businesses.

“So yes, Chinese rulers and businesspeople might be right when they don’t see themselves as colonialists, but does this mean a benefit for Africa in the end? I am afraid not, but I hope to be wrong.” DM

Photo: Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi addresses journalists during a press conference after a meeting with Kenyan Foreign Minister Amina Mohamed (not pictured) at the Kenyan Foreign Ministry offices in Nairobi, Kenya, 10 January 2015. EPA/DANIEL IRUNGU

Read more:

  • China denies building empire in Africa on the Guardian
Gallery

In other news...

South Africa is in a very real battle. A political fight where terms such as truth and democracy can seem more of a suggestion as opposed to a necessity.

On one side of the battle are those openly willing to undermine the sovereignty of a democratic society, completely disregarding the weight and power of the oaths declared when they took office. If their mission was to decrease society’s trust in government - mission accomplished.

And on the other side are those who believe in the ethos of a country whose constitution was once declared the most progressive in the world. The hope that truth, justice and accountability in politics, business and society is not simply fairy tale dust sprinkled in great electoral speeches; but rather a cause that needs to be intentionally acted upon every day.

However, it would be an offensive oversight not to acknowledge that right there on the front lines, alongside whistleblowers and civil society, stand the journalists. Armed with only their determination to inform society and defend the truth, caught in the crossfire of shots fired from both sides.

If you believe in supporting the cause and the work of Daily Maverick then take your position on the battleground and sign up to Maverick Insider today.

For whatever amount you choose, you can support Daily Maverick and it only takes a minute.

Support Daily MaverickPayment options


Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or if you are already an Insider.

OP-ED

Decision to set aside Seriti Commission findings will have a profound impact

By Andrew Feinstein, Paul Holden and Hennie van Vuuren

"You at this time can only be destroyed by yourselves from within and not from without. You have reached the point where the victory is to be won from within and can only be lost from within." ~ Marcus Garvey