This is not a paywall.

Register for free to continue reading.

We made a promise to you that we’ll never erect a paywall and we intend to keep that promise. We also want to continually improve your reading experience and you can help us do that by registering with us. It’s quick, easy and will cost you nothing.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish up registering with us:

Please enter your password or get a login link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for registering.

First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Eskom’s leadership quandary: Can anyone deliver?

Business Maverick

Business Maverick

Eskom’s leadership quandary: Can anyone deliver?

On 5 December 2013, Eskom announced the resignation of its CEO, Brian Dames, three years after he had assumed the position following the controversial axing of the previous CEO, Jacob Maroga, who also held the position for only three years. Whatever the reasons for their early departures, clearly both Dames and Maroga failed in their missions by leaving before their job was done. Whoever comes next, will have a massive task at hand. By CHRIS YELLAND.

Dames’ resignation also comes five months after the early departure of Eskom’s former finance director, Paul O’Flaherty. The two were closely linked as the drivers of the utility’s massive R350-billion new-build programme – the Medupi and Kusile coal-fired power stations, the Ingula pumped-storage scheme, the return-to-service of the Grootvlei, Komati and Camden power stations, and the associated strengthening of the transmission grid.

Despite official denials of any such linkage, the moves by Dames and O’Flaherty came after they announced on 8 July 2013 a further six to twelve month delay for first power from Medupi to mid/end 2014. The minister of public enterprises, Malusi Gigaba, had publicly warned on 11 April 2013 that “heads will roll” if first power from Medupi were delayed beyond the end of December 2013.

The early departure of Eskom leaders no doubt reflects some frustration at the lack of a clear policy direction, understanding and common purpose between the ruling party, government (cabinet, department of energy and department of public enterprises) and Eskom, and the absence of an effective broader electricity supply industry leadership with a clear, consistent and inspiring vision.

So, the question arises now – who should be appointed to replace Brian Dames? What we surely don’t need at this juncture is simply a good manager of a large monolithic state-owned enterprise under the current status quo.

While the economic, social and business environment of South Africa, the region, and indeed the world, has undergone dramatic changes over the last fifty years, the organisation of Eskom as a vertically integrated state-owned monopoly remains essentially unchanged, and is quite inappropriate for the new order.

Both the chairman and CEO of Eskom have acknowledged the need to revisit the business model of Eskom – but does their vision extend far enough? Clearly there are major structural, financial and sustainability issues facing both Eskom and the whole electricity supply industry, including:

  • the diversification of the primary energy mix, to include nuclear, gas, imported hydro and renewable energy;

  • business and environmental sustainability, including issues surrounding coal, water and air pollution;

  • financing of Eskom through increased shareholder equity;

  • unbundling of Eskom Generation;

  • establishment of an independent system and market operator from Eskom Transmission;

  • introduction of independent power producers and competition into the generation sector;

  • establishment of a wholesale electricity market;

  • restructuring and rationalisation of the electricity distribution industry; and

  • introduction of retail electricity price competition.

In the first instance we surely need an inspiring industry leadership with a vision:

  • that extends well beyond just managing the current business of Eskom – a vision that encompasses the whole electricity supply industry of South and Southern Africa;

  • that understands and accepts the need to move away from the current central planning, command and control model, which is failing, to a more customer focussed and market-driven approach;

  • that sees Eskom as just one of several players on level playing fields in a wider and growing circle of diverse electricity companies, spanning the generation, transmission, distribution and retail sectors in South Africa and the region; and

  • that appreciates the need to unbundle and restructure Eskom to increase equity (state, local and foreign), diversity (ownership and primary energy sources), competition, and grid and market access, in order to manage risks, increase responsiveness and flexibility, and unlock and access new capital, business potential, technology, skills, experience and efficiency.

It is further obvious that the leadership should:

  • have a broad understanding of the South African economy, the National Development Plan, the role and importance of energy and electricity for economic and social development, and the industrial, municipal, agricultural and domestic electricity needs of South Africa;

  • be well versed in international, national and corporate finance;

  • have experience in the workings of government and state-owned enterprises, with significant leadership and large organisation management skills;

  • have strong political connections and influence, and the respect of both government and business, with the necessary stature and ability to inspire political structures, government, senior and middle Eskom management, and labour of the need for change and restructuring; and

  • have the ability to build and inspire a like-minded, dedicated, loyal and committed executive management team around him.

In the words of an old industry hand: “In asking who should be the next CEO of Eskom, I am afraid it is the usual situation of asking a simple question in the expectation of a simple answer, and then getting a load of complex questions in response”. He suggests the first question to be answered, which government and Eskom have studiously avoided: “Is Eskom as currently structured still a manageable business?” He says you can’t keep sacrificing people by having them bash their heads against a brick wall. You need to do something about the wall.

The last great leader of Eskom had as his mission to guide the Eskom ship unscathed and in one piece through the rough seas of political change during the 1990s. Dr Ian McRae succeeded in this task with a vision of “electricity for all”, which mobilised and united Eskom, and convinced the new ruling party and government to keep Eskom intact.

The new leadership at Eskom will have its work cut out with a new and quite different mission – to unbundle and restructure both Eskom and the wider electricity supply industry, in order to meet the new needs of South Africa, raise capital, manage risks, increase diversity and maximise flexibility. Not an easy task. The future of South Africa may well depend on it.

Anyone asked Trevor? DM

Chris Yelland is the investigative editor at EE Publishers.

Photo: Medupi Power Station near Lephalale. (Werner Beukes/SAPA)


Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted