Newsdeck

Newsdeck

Kenyan Presidential Election Heads To Nail-Biting Finish

Kenyan Presidential Election Heads To Nail-Biting Finish

Kenya's presidential race has tightened as early pace-setter Uhuru Kenyatta's lead shrank over his main rival Prime Minister Raila Odinga, raising the prospect of a second round run-off. By James Macharia and George Obulutsa.

Deputy Prime Minister Kenyatta, 51, who is due to go on trial at the Hague for crimes against humanity linked to the violent aftermath of the last election in 2007, had led since results started trickling in after polls closed on Monday.

Results from strongholds loyal to Odinga, 68, closed the gap, but with a quarter of votes yet to be counted, the contest still could go either way.

By 2300 GMT on Thursday, with 7.51 million total votes tallied, Kenyatta had 3,700,967 or 49.3 percent, to Odinga’s 3,366,757 or 44.81, according to a display by the electoral commission at the national tallying centre.

However, this tally was only for 169 constituencies out of a total of 291, meaning it could change either way.

Counting has been unexpectedly slow, with a final result not seen until Friday at the earliest.

An outright win by either candidate would require more than 50 percent of the vote, short of which a run-off is mandatory.

Turnout was estimated at more than 70 percent of the 14.3 million eligible voters, who were undeterred by pockets of violence that killed at least 15 people.

The poll is seen as a critical test for east Africa’s largest economy, whose reputation as a stable democracy was damaged by the bloodshed that followed the 2007 election. Much will rest on whether the final result is accepted, and whether any challenges take place in the courts or on the streets.

Despite the delays and technical glitches, international observers have broadly said the vote and count were transparent.

But Odinga’s camp challenged the process on Thursday when the tally still showed Kenyatta on course to win in a single round. They said counting should be stopped because it lacked integrity and that some results were being “doctored”, raising tensions in what so far has been a mostly peaceful process.

Election officials, who have up to seven days from Monday’s vote to declare the outcome, said the count would not stop.

Issack Hassan, chairman of the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission, said the vote tally was genuine.

MAJOR TEST

The European Union ambassador to Kenya, Lodewijk Briet, said the vote counting was sound and should be allowed to continue.

“As chairman Hassan has just said it should not be stopped midway. It should continue. If people have a problem with the integrity, the legal disputes settlement mechanism exist and should be followed,” Briet told Reuters.

The United States and other Western nations, big donors that view Kenya as vital in the regional battle with militant Islam, have already indicated that a victory by Kenyatta would complicate diplomatic relations.

The Kenyan shilling has swayed against the dollar, gaining on reassurances of a smooth counting process and buckling on concerns that delays in announcing a winner would prompt rivals to challenge the election outcome. Analysts said a run-off would unnerve markets by prolonging the uncertainty.

Kenyatta, son of Kenya’s founding president Jomo Kenyatta, and his running mate, William Ruto, both face trial at the International Criminal Court in The Hague on charges of unleashing death squads after the 2007 election. Both men deny the charges and have said they plan to clear their names.

The Jubilee coalition has also complained about the delays, and accused British High Commissioner Christian Turner of seeking to meddle in the vote. Turner said the accusations were “entirely false and misleading”, showing how brittle both sides in the race have become in a tense race. DM

Photo: Kalonzo Musyoka, the running mate of Kenya’s presidential candidate Raila Odinga, speaks during a news conference in Nairobi March 7, 2013. Musyoka called for the vote count to be halted on Thursday and cast doubt on the fairness of a process that is still incomplete three days after the poll, remarks that could inflame a largely peaceful election. REUTERS/Siegfried Modola

Gallery

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Feeling powerless in politics?

Equip yourself with the tools you need for an informed decision this election. Get the Elections Toolbox with shareable party manifesto guide.