UN’s slap on the wrist won’t deter Eritrea

By Simon Allison 7 December 2011

The United Nations Security Council passed new sanctions against Eritrea on Monday, punishing the tiny country in the Horn of Africa for its continued political, financial, training and logistical support to Al Shabaab, the radical Islamist militant group in Somalia – an allegation which Eritrea denies. But with sanctions as weak as these, there’s not much incentive for Eritrea to change its ways. By SIMON ALLISON.

Helping the Security Council make up its mind to impose new sanctions on Eritrea were officials from five of Eritrea’s neighbours, who spoke via video link from Addis Ababa. But it was Ethiopia, Eritrea’s mortal enemy, that really enjoyed putting the boot in. Said Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi: “Eritrea is a prime source of instability for the whole region. It’s a problem of attitude, of a certain clique in Asmara [Eritrea’s capital] that has never grown up; it’s a problem of lawlessness and reckless disregard for international norms.”

Initially, the sanctions – proposed by Gabon, enjoying their temporary seat on the Security Council – were tough, envisaging a complete ban on mining investment in mining imports from Eritrea. This would have hurt the regime of President Isaias Afwerki badly, as his desperately poor country is rumoured to be on the verge of a mineral boom that could turn its economy around. But the big boys on the Security Council – in this case China, Russia and the USA – weren’t interested in such harsh measures, voicing concerns about punishing the Eritrean people as a whole. But most likely they were thinking more pragmatically, unwilling to cut off potentially lucrative opportunities.

In the end, the new sanctions barely added to those already in place, which include a freeze on weapon sales to Eritrea and travel bans and asset freezes on selected officials. The new measures, passed with 13 positive votes and two abstentions, reiterate the existing sanctions, and encourage mining companies involved in Eritrea to exercise “vigilance” to ensure they’re not helping to destabilise the region. They’re a slap on the wrist for Eritrea, but nothing more. The UN will need to get a lot tougher if it’s serious about reining in Afwerki’s regime. DM



Support DAILY MAVERICK & get FREE UBER vouchers every month

An increasingly rare commodity, quality independent journalism costs money, though not nearly as much as its absence can cost global community. No country can live and prosper without truth - that's why it matters.

Every Daily Maverick article and every Scorpio exposé is proof of our dedication to this unshakeable mission. Investing in our news media is by far the most effective investment into South Africa's future.

You can support Independent and Investigative journalism by joining Maverick Insider. If you contribute R150 or more per month you will receive R100 back in UBER vouchers. EVERY MONTH until October 2019.

So, if you'd like to help and do something meaningful for yourself and your country, then sign up to become a Maverick Insider. Together we can Defend Truth.


Litigious Zuma liable for R16m in fees

By Greg Nicolson

Tigers cannot purr.