First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Heir today, gone tomorrow?

Media

Media

Heir today, gone tomorrow?

How long can James Murdoch possibly hang on to his position? As he gears up to face the parliamentary committee again next week, that same committee has just released a stash of documents internal to News International which prove that the knowledge about phone-hacking within the organisation dates back to at least 2008. By REBECCA DAVIS.

You may recall that when James Murdoch and his cantankerous father last addressed the House of Commons, in July, James swore blind that he had absolutely no, zero, zip, zilch idea that there was any phone-hacking going on whatsoever until he found out about it in 2010, when the Guardian began running an investigation on it.

But his story began to unravel when the News of the World’s former editor, Colin Myler, and the corporation’s legal manager, Tom Crone, both told Parliament that they had personally informed Murdoch about phone-hacking back in ’08. That was at the end of July. Now the parliamentary committee has released a cache of documents which make things look really sticky for James. Most damning among them is a letter from 2008 from News International’s lawyer Michael Silverleaf, announcing that they were unlikely to win a lawsuit brought against them by hacking victim Gordon Taylor because “there is overwhelming evidence of the involvement of a number of senior NGN [News Group Newspapers] journalists in the illegal enquiries”.

Of course, Murdoch will likely claim next week that he never saw the letter (as implausible as that idea is). But there’s also the matter of a set of notes from a conversation that Myler had with Murdoch in May 2008 – about the phone-hacking lawsuit.

There is, in short, basically incontrovertible evidence that James knew what was going on. How will he get out of this one? Stay tuned… DM



Read more:

  • Murdoch faces questions after memo reveals hacking was widespread, in The Telegraph.

Photo: REUTERS

Gallery

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted