First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Google Maps causes international incident, again


Media, Politics, Sci-Tech

Google Maps causes international incident, again

You’d think that sovereign governments, with maps of their own and with recourse to the UN Security Council should their territories be violated, might be less sensitive about Google Maps. You’d also think that military commanders wouldn’t use Google Maps to justify an invasion. On both counts, you’d be wrong. By KEVIN BLOOM.

In February this year, the government of Cambodia accused the world’s largest search engine of being “professionally irresponsible”. The source of their anger was a “radically misleading” map of the disputed Thai-Cambodia border, which Google Maps apparently rendered to favour the kingdom of Thailand. Unbeknown to the techies at Google headquarters, the two countries had been involved in deadly clashes along the line since 2007 – a heavy military presence had long characterised the region, at the centre of which stood an 11th century Preah Vihear temple placed under Cambodian ownership by a 1962 international court ruling. The diplomatic incident forced Google to spend months sorting out the problem, and in July the company announced it had officially redrawn several national boundaries to more accurately reflect disputed territories.

“While we always strive to display the on-the-ground reality of a boundary’s position, in practice some boundary lines are not as accurate as we would like them to be due to the available resolution of our boundary data,” Charlie Hale, a Google geo policy analyst, wrote on the company’s blog at the time. Hale also explained that behind Google Maps lies a complex process that relies on a range of spatial data (imagery, boundaries, place names, etc.) from a variety of sources, and that “the depiction of borders is something upon which local authorities, governments and internationally recognised bodies often disagree.”

He wasn’t joking. Last week, Google found itself embroiled in another international incident when Nicaraguan troops accidentally invaded Costa Rica. The cause was again an error in Google Maps, which senior Nicaraguan army officer Eden Pastora used to “justify” the incursion into Costa Rican territory. The soldiers under Pastora’s command set up camp near the disputed San Juan lake, which runs between the two countries, and even replaced a Costa Rican flag they spotted with a Nicaraguan one.

Costa Rica doesn’t have a military, and so were naturally upset by the violation. Also, the official maps of both countries indicate that the region belongs unquestionably to Costa Rica. According to AFP, the Organization of American States (OAS) was asked by Costa Rica to investigate the incursion, and on Saturday 5 November Costa Rican President Laura Chinchilla said she was prepared to take the dispute to the UN Security Council if the OAS could not find a solution. “Costa Rica is seeing its dignity smeared and there is a sense of great national urgency” to resolve this problem, Chinchilla said.

For its part, Google conceded the mistake. The same Charlie Hale, after a discussion with US State Department officials, said that “there was indeed an error in the compilation of the source data, by up to 2.7 kilometers (1.7 miles),” adding, “we are now working to update our maps.” Unsurprisingly, the Nicaraguan government wasn’t happy with Google’s announcement that it would change its map. “I officially request that [the border] not be modified,” Nicaragua’s Foreign Minister Samuel Santos asked a Google representative.

More embarrassing for Google, though, is the fact that its competitor Bing got the border right. Fast Company couldn’t resist pointing out how this could play into Bing’s next marketing strategy – “Bing, the search engine that doesn’t cause international disputes” – and then it framed the issue that seems to be the real core of this story:

“You may well blame the Nicaraguan military for using Google Maps – which, for all its usefulness in everyday life, is a relatively imprecise tool for official exercises near borders. But it’s been little more than three years since the British Navy had the same problem, straying into Iranian waters by accident (Iran being far more dangerous than Costa Rica, which doesn’t even have a full-time military) and blaming its military-grade GPS equipment for the error. A month before that, the Swiss military blundered into Liechtenstein on a training exercise – because, they said, it was dark. That, at least, was one border crossing Google Maps might have prevented.” DM

Read more: “Improving the quality of borders in Google Earth and Maps,” in Google Lat Long Blog, “Google Maps embroiled in Central America border dispute,” in AFP, “How Google Maps Led to An Accidental Invasion,” in Fast Company.


Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted