Media

Media, Politics

Nobel Peace Prize: the official true Chinese version emerges

Nobel Peace Prize: the official true Chinese version emerges

The Chinese Communist Party’s week-late “official” response to Liu Xiaobo’s Nobel Peace Prize is he’s actually a “splittist” like his fellow laureate, the Dalai Lama, and anyway, it’s all a filthy Western plot against China. By JULIAN SMISEK.

On Friday, the Chinese Communist Party’s propaganda department relaxed its total news blackout around Nobel Peace Prize winner Liu Xiaobo, instructing major online news portals, including Netease and Sina, to prominently position a pair of Xinhua Daily articles responding to the announcement.

The two articles are titled “From the Dalai Lama to Liu Xiaobo: What the Nobel Peace Prize Tells Us” and “Giving the Nobel Peace Prize to Liu Xiaobo was an Especially Big Mistake”.

Following days of media blackout, the strong push behind the two articles suggests that the party’s propaganda apparatus is finally gearing up to “lead public opinion”, a media-control strategy used by the party since 2005. Before 2005, it typically responded to negative events by suppressing all related news stories. Over the last five years, however, its more common reaction to politically sensitive news has been to temporarily block all reports, craft an official version of events and order media outlets to publish only the official version.

On 8 October, the day of the Nobel Peace Prize announcement, Xinhua published online the negative reaction of Ma Chaoxu, spokesman for China’s foreign ministry. But the Nobel news was instantly scrubbed from China’s domestic on- and offline media, and keyword filters were set in place to block discussion and searches of the Nobel Prize or Liu Xiaobo.

The two new articles illustrate the party’s line of attack: Discredit both the recipient and the prize, and cast the award as an attempt by Western forces to control China.

“From the Dalai Lama to Liu Xiaobo” begins with the money quote [translated here]: “A few people abroad have reacted to the news with joy, frolicking around as though they’ve taken drugs. One of these people is the Dalai Lama, who won the Peace Prize in 1989.

“It’s a good thing the Dalai Lama came out [to congratulate Liu Xiaobo] because it reminds every Chinese person to think about why these two men won the Nobel Peace Prize. What’s the underlying link?”

This question is immediately answered: “The Dalai Lama and Liu Xiaobo are the political dolls of Western forces”. From there, the author repeats the party line on Tibet and the Dalai Lama (he’s a “splittist”) and connects him to Liu Xiaobo. The hoped-for effect is to turn the Dalai Lama into a pair of concrete boots for Liu, helping him on his swim through Chinese public opinion.

The piece moves on to make the more legitimate point that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given to a few shady characters in the past, and not given to others who may have been more deserving, such as Gandhi.

The article ends by imploring readers to guard against various attempts by Western forces to contain China. “The time of the award is not an accident.” From “Tibetan independence” and “currency wars” to “military manoeuvres” and the “Diaoyu Islands incident”, Western forces are attempting to “gain unilateral economic benefit” and “contain China militarily”.

Xinhua released the second article, “Giving the Nobel Peace Prize to Liu Xiaobo was an Especially Big Mistake,” in both English and Chinese so interested readers can click through below. The article quotes heavily from Arnulf Kolstad, a professor at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, who believes that Liu Xiaobo’s actions did not fulfil the Nobel Peace Prize’s criteria.

Keyword filters are still in effect across various news portals, but the biggest Chinese portal Baidu is now linking to these two stories when searches are performed on Liu Xiaobo. DM


This article first appeared on Danwei.org.

Read more: “Big mistake to award Nobel Peace Prize to noncontributor to peace: Norwegian professor” at Xinhua.

Gallery

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

X

This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.


Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Feeling powerless in politics?

Equip yourself with the tools you need for an informed decision this election. Get the Elections Toolbox with shareable party manifesto guide.