This is not a paywall.

Register for free to continue reading.

The news sucks. But your reading experience doesn't have to. Help us improve that for you by registering for free.

Please create a password or click to receive a login link.

Please enter your password or get a login link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for registering.

First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Glossy magazines take a monumental thrashing

Business Maverick

Business Maverick

Glossy magazines take a monumental thrashing

For the United States magazine sector, 2009 was one of the worst years in living memory. A total of 428 titles closed, and almost 60,000 less advertising pages were sold against 2008. Is there a positive spin here?

According to common media wisdom (whatever that is), the magazine sector is supposed to be particularly hard hit in times of economic recession. Magazines are meant to be a luxury purchase, a glossy and expensive item that requires the sort of cover-price outlay that should ideally be spent on groceries or monthly insurance payments or nursery school fees. How true is this perception? If you work in the magazine sector in the United States, it’s so true you probably don’t have a job anymore.

Over 400 magazines folded in the US in 2009, and the list of titles that are no longer with us reads like a community’s memorial to its war dead. Shiny and fresh-faced titles like Portfolio, BusinessWeek Small Biz and Cookie; older, respected titles like Country Home, Elegant Bride and Best Life; even an established and decorated veteran like Gourmet, which was for decades to the food industry what Vogue is to fashion.

Thing is, of course, these magazines didn’t fold just because their readers could no longer afford to buy them. Far more harmful to the health of magazines last year was the incredibly steep drop in advertising – the worst drop in the decade of data, according to the New York Times, that the Publishers Information Bureau (PIB) has at its disposal.

The press release issued by the PIB on Tuesday opened as follows: “Total magazine rate-card-reported advertising revenue for full-year 2009 closed at $19,450,949,762, posting a 18.1% decline against the previous year… A total of 169,217.76 advertising pages were generated throughout the year, a drop of 25.6% compared to 2008. In the fourth quarter of 2009, PIB revenue generated $5,778,429,251, which was a 12.4% decrease compared to 2008’s fourth quarter. There were 48,958.92 advertising pages counted for the quarter, a decline of 21.6% compared to the same period in 2008.”

In a nutshell: carnage.

The New York Times tried to put these numbers in perspective by reporting that a total of 58,340 advertising pages were lost – in the sense of “vanished,” “disappeared,” “went missing” – by American magazines last year. “Time Inc. lost about 4,500 ad pages, with Fortune (down 36 percent) and Money (down 29.1 percent) leading the declines,” the Times observed. In second place on the publishing house percentage loss charts was Hearst, some 3,400 pages down, with every one of its magazines posting declines. The biggest loser in overall (non-percentage) terms, though, was Conde Nast – who sold a whopping 11,500 fewer advertising pages in 2009 than in 2008.

A few deluded hopefuls, perhaps unable to put down their “positive thinking” manuals long enough to apprehend reality, tried their best to find the silver lining. While 428 magazines folded in the US in 2009, they gushed, did you know that 275 new titles were launched?

Uh, ja, thanks… we do now.

By Kevin Bloom

Read more: New York Times, Huffington Post


Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted