Of course, the letters were written at different times, in different situations. Mbeki’s letter is an attempt (in vain as it turned out) to combat the impression that his speeches mentioning “tribalism” were coded messages in the battle for party leadership against Zuma.
Zuma’s letter constitutes an attempt to draw a line under the notion that rifts are developing within the ANC over economic direction.
What they have in common are attempts to debunk the blindingly obvious; in Mbeki’s case that a contest for leadership was underway and in Zuma’s case that there is a contest over economic direction. Both appeal to ANC traditions in order to claim that these “impressions” or “interpretations” are in fact misunderstandings.
Yet beyond the immediate issues of their times, they constitute good examples of extraordinary differences in approach.
Mbeki’s letter, for example, proceeds from the point of view that anyone who does not see things his way is simply deluded. He actually uses the description “so-called leadership struggle”.
Figure 1: Mbeki’s word-cloud
Presumably he would choose to describe it differently, but that there was a leadership contest was at the time absolutely beyond debate, as Mbeki surely knew – since he had announced his intention to contest the post. Yet nowhere in the speech does Mbeki even slightly concede that something of that nature might just possibly be going on in the background.
The focus is entirely on people’s misunderstanding of him and what he said. Hence, he spends much of the letter quoting himself, in an effort to demonstrate what he actually meant and how wrong people were in interpreting him wrongly. He also spends large amounts of space quoting the Sunday Independent, to demonstrate what other people think wrongly about him.
The impression created is of someone acting in blithe indifference to the issue of the day. Worse in fact; he positively confused that anyone should suspect that he might be concerned with the issue at all.
Zuma’s approach was almost exactly the opposite: he focused immediately on the issue of the day, but sought to interpret it differently. Instead of staunch denial the approach is subtle reinterpretation.
Hence, while for Mbeki the leadership contest was forcibly removed into the background, in Zuma’s letter the struggle over economic direction is attacked head-on. The tone is less censorious, less personal, and more a genuine attempt to convince than a bare assertion.
Zuma engages in conversation; Mbeki in declaration. Although frustrating and annoying, the big advantage Mbeki had in adopting this approach during his presidency was that he could be bound by nothing.
Figure 2: Zuma’s word-cloud
For Zuma, engaging in debate and supporting the notion of debate is to encourage it, and Zuma risks by adopting this approach an ongoing war of interdepartmental attrition right through his term of office.
Parsing the two speeches for often repeated words produces two word clouds (a rather neat way to graphically illustrate such things) where “ANC” comes across clearly as the dominant theme in both cases. The words “policy” and “movement” are respectively the second most used words, but perhaps they should be discarded since these were both the topics under discussion.
The key word is perhaps “people”, far more dominant in the Zuma speech than in the Mbeki speech, and “leadership” which appears in the Mbeki speech, but not at all in the Zuma speech.
An infallible guide? Perhaps not, but indicative, certainly.
By Tim Cohen
Photo: Former South African president, Nelson Mandela (C) smiles as he arrives with African National Congress (ANC) president Jacob Zuma (L) and South Africa’s president Thabo Mbeki at the Loftus stadium in Pretoria during an rally organised by the ANC to celebrate Nelson Mandela’s 90th birthday August 2, 2008. REUTERS/Siphiwe Sibeko
Watch Pauli van Wyk’s Cat Play The Piano Here!
No, not really. But now that we have your attention, we wanted to tell you a little bit about what happened at SARS.
Tom Moyane and his cronies bequeathed South Africa with a R48-billion tax shortfall, as of February 2018. It's the only thing that grew under Moyane's tenure... the year before, the hole had been R30.7-billion. And to fund those shortfalls, you know who has to cough up? You - the South African taxpayer.
It was the sterling work of a team of investigative journalists, Scorpio’s Pauli van Wyk and Marianne Thamm along with our great friends at amaBhungane, that caused the SARS capturers to be finally flushed out of the system. Moyane, Makwakwa… the lot of them... gone.
But our job is not yet done. We need more readers to become Maverick Insiders, the friends who will help ensure that many more investigations will come. Contributions go directly towards growing our editorial team and ensuring that Daily Maverick and Scorpio have a sustainable future. We can’t rely on advertising and don't want to restrict access to only those who can afford a paywall subscription. Membership is about more than just contributing financially – it is about how we Defend Truth, together.
So, if you feel so inclined, and would like a way to support the cause, please join our community of Maverick Insiders.... you could view it as the opposite of a sin tax. And if you are already Maverick Insider, tell your mother, call a friend, whisper to your loved one, shout at your boss, write to a stranger, announce it on your social network. The battle for the future of South Africa is on, and you can be part of it.
By the time of his death in 1987, Hitler's deputy Rudolph Hess was the sole prisoner in Spandau prison, a facility designed for 600.