Shareholders in 16 American funds have roundly defeated a non-binding proposal to pull investments from companies doing business in Sudan. Reuters says more than 80% of votes cast at each of the funds opposed the measures. The measures are part a campaign to pressure several Chinese oil companies whose royalty payments are said to prop up Sudan's central government. Sudan is taboo for many in the West over alleged gross human-rights abuses in the conflict-torn western Darfur region. The International Criminal Court in The Hague has issued an arrest warrant for Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir for crimes against humanity. And while the US is not a signatory of the ICC, it seems strange that there is any private American investment at all considering the long-standing financial embargoes it has on places such as Cuba. Activists, led by Boston-based Investors Against Genocide, had complained the vote was marred by an abridged ballot and by poor telephone-polling procedures. They would no doubt also be concerned that the funds in question invest in Chinese oil companies doing business in largely undemocratic African states, contrary to a stand on business and human rights. Read more: Reuters, Reuters
While we have your attention...
An increasingly rare commodity, quality independent journalism costs money - though not nearly as much as its absence.
Every article, every day, is our contribution to Defending Truth in South Africa. If you would like to join us on this mission, you could do much worse than support Daily Maverick's quest by becoming a Maverick Insider.
Click here to become a Maverick Insider and get a closer look at the Truth.
"We spend the first year of a child's life teaching it to walk and talk and the rest of its life to shut up and sit down. There's something wrong there." ~ Neil deGrasse Tyson