First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Obama needs to do some fancy footwork on climate change

Defend Truth

Obama needs to do some fancy footwork on climate change

US President Barak Obama is in a tricky position at the UN Climate Change Summit in Copenhagen next month. His predecessor, George W Bush, is now notorious for trashing the last attempt at a climate change agreement, so attention will be abnormally focused on Obama this time around. However, Obama is constrained by what the US Congress might ultimately approve and there is no consensus on what that might be. The New York Times reports that Obama will announce the specific target “in coming days”. Yet what this target might be is so far unclear, as is his attendance at the summit. Obama’s spokesmen have said he will consider attending if his presence could be a useful impetus to a deal. Presumably that depends on whether the US target is considered aggressive or wimpy. It seems unlikely, but conceivable, if Obama decides in favour of prudence, that it may not be a case of Obama pondering whether to go or not; they might not want him there. Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/24/science/earth/24climate.html

Gallery

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted