First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Even publishing royalty is feeling the pinch as Condé...

Defend Truth

Even publishing royalty is feeling the pinch as Condé Nast ad pages plummet

Times are tough for everybody, but especially so for dead-tree publishers. Small ones. Niche ones. And, it appears, some of the biggest names in the industry too. According to estimates released on Wednesday, the number of advertising pages in magazines in the Condé Nast stable declined by around one third this year. That is rather steeper than could have been expected even in the midst of a recession; the company tends towards higher-end magazines with luxury brand advertisements. From the kind of companies that shouldn't blink during short-term consumer slumps. Or maybe not. Read more: New York Times


Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted