This is not a paywall.

Register for free to continue reading.

We made a promise to you that we’ll never erect a paywall and we intend to keep that promise. We also want to continually improve your reading experience and you can help us do that by registering with us. It’s quick, easy and will cost you nothing.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish up registering with us:

Please enter your password or get a login link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for registering.

First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

ANALYSIS: What do JFK, the Moon landing and Jacob Marog...

Business Maverick

Business Maverick, Politics

ANALYSIS: What do JFK, the Moon landing and Jacob Maroga have in common?

Eskom’s explanation about its leadership crisis raises more questions than it answers.

There are some things that people just want to know. They want to know who killed JFK. They want to know if a man really walked on the moon, or if it was actually an elaborate Hollywood set. When it comes to Eskom, people want to know what’s happening not because of the inherent interest of the subject, but because there is a good chance it will affect their ability to make coffee in the morning. And if they can’t make coffee that would cause personal discomfort and repeated expletive outbursts, which could lead to high blood pressure and broken homes.

So after nearly a week’s worth of confusion in which the CEO Jacob Maroga was said to have resigned, then apparently didn’t, then the Chairman Bobby Godsell resigned, but may not have, Eskom finally held a press conference today to explain everything.

Courtesy of press association Sapa, this is what we now know:

  • According to Eskom chairman Mpho Makwana, Jacob Maroga is no longer chief executive officer at Eskom.
  • Makwana met with Moroga for a full day on Wednesday and he is satisfied Maroga has resigned.
  • In 90 days, Eskom hopes to be “as close as possible” to identifying a key candidate as CEO.
  • Maroga did not get a golden handshake.
  • The key task of Eskom is to continue to provide continuous secure electricity.

Are we clear now? No, not really.

Why is it that Makwana is satisfied that Maroga has resigned? It sounds a bit like Maroga’s resignation is something that Makwana believes rather than being an actual fact, which is exactly what the problem has been from the start.

One theory about what actually happened is this: Maroga presented to the board a transformation plan, saying if the board did not accept his plan, he would be obliged to resign. The board did not accept the plan, but did accept his resignation, taking him at his word.

If you play chicken, you need to be prepared to lose. He played. He lost.

This is the reason why in the mind of the board, he resigned, but in his mind, he apparently has not actually, as yet, finally, totally resigned on paper. Except that apparently he now has.

This would explain why the ANC Youth League, in the midst of a racial rampage, taunted the board by demanding they produce Maroga’s actual resignation letter, which obviously the board could not do because there was an ultimatum, but no letter.However, this is just a theory. What actually happened is still unclear.

There are other things we don’t know, among which are these:

  • What did President Jacob Zuma say to former chairman Bobby Godsell? For example, did he want him to stay or did he invite Godsell to leave?
  • Is the government’s position that Maroga should go or that he should stay?
  • Does the government, the sole shareholder, support Maroga’s transformation plan, or not? Or to put it another way, is the board on the way out at the next available opportunity?
  • Who did really kill JFK?

The turn of events also raises another problem; did the ANC Youth League once again blunder into an area of national crisis boots first? The League and the Black Management Forum appear to have sided with Maroga without realising that he had been involved in this game of chicken with the board. If they knew that he had made acceptance of his plan a prerequisite for his continuation as CEO, then surely the Eskom situation is at the very least comparable to the situation with SA athletics boss Leonard Chuene – who was supported to the hilt, only for it to emerge later he had lied.

The Youth League has had to backtrack and withdraw its allegations in that case. It had to backtrack and withdraw its allegations against Nedcor in a separate but related miss-accusation. Will it have to do so again? This is one of the things people need to know.

By Tim Cohen


Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted