First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Godsell’s gone. What’s next for Eskom board?

Defend Truth


Godsell’s gone. What’s next for Eskom board?

It didn’t take long for Bobby Godsell to go, and it didn’t take him long to explain, carefully, why.

He wouldn’t submit to the bright lights and probing microphones, but he used the power of text to do it in a published statement.  The juice was in the fourth paragraph. “Thus far, government, as Eskom’s sole shareholder, has been unable either to support the Board’s original decision (to accept the resignation) or its two attempts at resolving this dispute.”

In other words; they won’t back me, so I’m leaving.

This is serious.  Our sources say the board originally decided Jacob Maroga should go. Sure, it came after a massive ding-dong battle and probably involved some words at louder-than-normal volume. But at some point Maroga buckled and offered to resign. The board accepted. In his statement, Godsell says that, according to the legal advice the board had received, the resignation has legal force and effect.

But somewhere along the line, once he’d thought about it a bit more, Maroga decided he’d like to stay on – even though it is one of the worst jobs in the country. He then did the political rounds. The ANC Youth League and the Black Management Forum were contacted. It seems Maroga may have had help, but he was able to access the top levels of the ANC as their common goals easily aligned. It worked.

While Godsell and the board were busying themselves with proposals like binding arbitration, all good legal stuff,  Maroga simply went for the political jugular. In the end, it took President Jacob Zuma to sit down with Godsell. We don’t know what happened, but it clearly led to the “government has been unable to support the board’s original decision (to accept the resignation)…”

Once again in South Africa, politics is more powerful than anything else. The legal text of employment contracts and other binding issues, performance and delivery, responsibility and stewardship; none of it really matters. What matters is the hotline to the powerful, the mighty, the loudest. And when Godsell realised it was time for him to get the hell out, nobody dared be on his side.

The question of board support still remains: Had Godsell gone out on some fateful limb, or did he have the backing of the board? It seems fantastic to us that he might have done his own thing. We’ve said it before: any chairman, of any board, be it Eskom or Die Blikkiesdorpkroeg, would have had to resign if the position of CEO went to a vote and that person was still standing at the end. Thus, he must have had the board’s backing.

So will the remaining Eskom board members swallow humble pie and simply stay on? The honourable thing for them to do would be to leave too.  If they thought that Godsell was right, that Maroga had properly resigned and that there was political interference, then they have no other course – of course, that is if they are independently minded and not worried about their future employment possibilities. If they don’t leave, they’ve let Godsell and all of us down badly. If they do, it’ll show how some people at least won’t put up with political interference and that the loudest people in the room are not always right.

The ball is in their court.

By Stephen Grootes
Grootes is an Eyewitness News reporter)


Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted