Maverick Life

Maverick Life

Op-Ed: Fact and fiction in Jurassic World

Op-Ed: Fact and fiction in Jurassic World

'Nothing in Jurassic World is natural!' proclaims Henry Wu, the chief scientist in Colin Trevorrow’s Jurassic World. And to complicate matters even further, he explains how even the DNA used to 'create' the animals is not authentic dinosaur DNA: gaps in the ancient genome have been filled with that of different living animals. In a movie such as this the public is often left wondering what is fact and what is fiction. Allow me to unravel some of this confusion. By PROFESSOR ANUSUYA CHINSAMY-TURAN.

The history of life on earth extends to about 3.8 billion years ago. Jurassic World attempts to showcase animals that existed in the Jurassic time period, which began about 208 million years ago (mya) and lasted for roughly 56 million years. However, some of the animals depicted in the movie are, in reality, found only in the Cretaceous time period (between about 152 – 65 mya). Many animals (including nonavian dinosaurs) that thrived in the Jurassic and the Cretaceous periods died out in the catastrophic mass extinction event that rocked our planet about 65 mya. Most of what we know about these extinct animals comes from studies of their fossilised bones and teeth, and from the palaeo-environments in which their remains are found. Under rare fossilisation circumstances, impressions of soft tissues (such as organs, skin and feathers) of these long gone animals are preserved. Studies of the fossilised remains have allowed us a glimpse into the lives of extinct animals and have permitted reconstructions of various aspects of their biology.

In Jurassic World, Indominus rex is quite obviously reminiscent of none other than the world’s best loved predatory dinosaur, Tyrannosaurus rex… with some enhancements. Dr Wu explains the T. rex DNA was genetically supplemented with DNA from other animals such as cuttle-fish and tree frogs. These particular genetic additions make Indominus capable of moderating its body temperature and camouflage. Its exceptional strategic abilities, including the plotting and scheming, are all clearly in the realm of fiction. Unlike Indominus, T. rex was a real dinosaur. It lived in the Cretaceous and is well known in the fossil record by a number of individuals, including juveniles and several adults. Research of the microscopic structure of T. rex bones show that it took about 18 years for the dinosaur to grow to about 14 metres in adult size.

Watch: Jurassic World – Official Global Trailer (HD)

In the movie, the raptors are based on real dinosaurs called Velociraptors that were only about half the size of those depicted in the movie. The fossil evidence shows that ‘raptors’ were pack hunters, and although we know that Velociraptors were not dim-witted, exactly how they hunted and whether they could have been ‘trained’, as Chris Pratt attempts in the movie, is pure speculation.

We know many large sauropods were herbivorous behemoths and much scientific research has gone into reconstructing their posture and locomotory habits. It was fabulous to see the animated Apatosaurus move on the big screen like scientists theorise, which is a far cry from the tail dragging dinosaurs of earlier movies.

My biggest disappointment in the movie was the lack of any feathered dinosaurs. For more than two decades we know that although some dinosaurs had typical reptilian scaly skin, many of them also had feathers. The feathers of some dinosaurs are identical to that of modern birds (their descendants), while in others the feathers appear to be prototypes of feathers or some sort of feather-like structures.

Besides the CGI dinosaurs, it was great to see the marine reptile (a mosasaur) leaping out of the water in Jurassic World. These gigantic carnivorous sea reptiles are not dinosaurs, and they only arrived on the scene in the Early Cretaceous. Some of the largest mosasaurs (like Mosasaurus hoffmanni) reached lengths of about 18m, but none are known to have reached the gigantic proportions of the movie’s version! Though it is true that, with enormous vicious teeth along the side of their jaws, and some in the roof of its mouth, mosasaurs were the top aquatic predators of the time!

Jurassic World’s flying terrors are also not dinosaurs. They are, however, based on real fossil creatures, called pterosaurs, that were the first flying vertebrates that took to the air on membranous wings. Pterosaurs were lightly built animals (lighter than any comparably sized bird) and they came in many different sizes. Some were sparrow-sized, whereas others, like Quetzalcoatlus were enormous, with wingspans of about 10-12 m. Many pterosaurs show special adaptations for eating fish (piscivory) and insectivory, although there were a few filter feeders. It is highly unlikely that these delicate-boned animals would have been able to lift an adult human off the ground (as in the movie)! I’m afraid the pterosaur attack is purely in the realm of fiction.

Like any good science fiction story, there are embedded elements of scientific fact in Jurassic World. This was true of Michael Crichton’s Jurassic Park, which Steven Spielberg turned into a blockbuster more than 20 years ago. Jurassic World stretches the evidence of what we know of earth’s prehistory into a fantasy that already has entertained and delighted millions of people around the world.

I am a real paleontologist, who studies dinosaurs, and although I think the story line of Jurassic World was terribly predictable and that it could have portrayed more real science, I loved the CGI extinct animals. It is my earnest hope that despite the embellishments Jurassic World, like the original Jurassic Park, will inspire a new generation of paleontologists and dinosaur enthusiasts. DM

Gallery

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options